HEGEMONY AND HYPOCRISY

U.S. elites reserve the right to use the world outside U.S. borders as a fiefdom which they consider they have the supreme right to control.

At times we hear this is a God-given right, at others, self-awarded with no need of higher sanction.

The global territories the U.S. elites deem their own to do with as they wish they also regard as areas where their writ must run and if not then they have the right to demand changes. This is not regarded as interference, more as being helpful in removing any and all barriers to what is right. And who decides what is right? The elites of the USA of course.

Is there a nation that is not subject to the will of these elites? No, though nations that correspond to their demands of rectitude and more importantly, their interests, are exempt on a case by case basis depending on them continuing to submit to their good graces.

This is considered to be the natural order of things and is generally agreed upon by those resting within the direct orbit of these elites.

The ultimate goal is for all nations to reside within the orbit of the USA acknowledging it as the unipolar, supremely dominant power, bar none, the arbiter of all right and wrong, judge, jury and executioner of Planet Earth.

There is a problem however.

Some nations wish to go their own way quite outside of the fiefdom the elites of the USA have taken upon themselves to govern, monitor and discipline whenever necessary.

This conflicts fundamentally with the needs and interests of U.S. elites and herein lies the crucial problem facing our species at this juncture in our history.

U.S. elites and their allies consider their systems of governance are superior to all others and that they have a mission to replace all inferior forms of governance and so bring recalcitrant nations into the fold of submission to what is right and best for them. However, some nations have leaderships which reject this offer of “help”. These nations regard their own systems of government as entirely adequate for the purpose and find it easy to point out obvious defects within the nations who consider their superiority provides them with ultimate authority.

This brings us to the thorny problem of unwanted interference.

As things stand, U.S. elites and their allies have the unrestricted right to interfere (though they would never use this word) anywhere, at any time, and by virtually any means with the justifications given above.

If there should be any suggestion however, that the complaints of those they are trying to “help” affected the saintly morale of their cultures sowing doubt and heaven save us (!) confusion then approbation at its loudest is heard, with a great swelling of breasts to indignantly anunciate, “How Dare They!” For this is interference in the proud and always faultlessly perfect and omnipotent USA, their teacher. How could this be? How very ungrateful!

The traffic of helpful suggestions, sometimes involving missiles is permitted only in one direction you see. Anything else is so unthinkable as to be almost an unimaginable crime beyond all human ken. Who could possibly believe that it is right to doubt their teacher much less trouble him with cries of unwarranted woe when what is being done is wholly for their own good?

Can’t they see how much better everything would be if they just obeyed the commands given, learn their lesson and submit quietly? Are they suffering so much from their mental deficiencies that they cannot understand this one simple instruction? To obey?

It’s almost as if they are ASKING for corporal punishment, isn’t it?