DO YOU WANT TO LIVE ON A PRISON PLANET?

No matter which way you look at it, the active movement of almost every part of western foreign policy is engaged in an effort to bring down powers that oppose it and replace the systems of governance within those powers. Concurrently the USA has, for two decades and more, sought to create a global surveillance system effected through satellites in geosynchronous orbit.

Have you considered what this will mean for your future and that of your offspring and their families as we move forward? Presumably you have also become aware of cancel culture whereby the previous norms of freedom of speech in the western world have become seriously curtailed. Speaking your mind these days can be a risky business. People are being warned to keep their mouths shut if what they wish to say does not fit the agreed narratives as supplied by state institutions and their  compliant stenographers within mainstream media.

Match these factors with the current ‘war mode’ against both Russia and China and extrapolate these combined factors into the future being assured that once instigated certain modes of behaviour and technologies to effect the expansion of their remit tend only to grow more forceful and all-pervasive over time.

If the coalition of the USA, UK and EU defeat Russia and then China using whatever means they deem necessary and, in light of the protocols clearly agreed upon after 9/11 to take out any and all threats from whichever direction they emanate from I think you will begin to envision the prison planet of which I speak. The concept is not hard to delineate or understand. The goal post 9/11 was not only to eliminate all individuals, groups and modes of governance that in any way opposed the USA or the expansion of western power, it was also to establish a system of surveillance to enable the early spotting of any nascent threats globally.

You see where this is going, don’t you? The political elites of the USA decided that only a virtual prison planet over which they were warders would suit their future needs for total security in the post 9/11 world. Naturally enough, all nations considering themselves in need of the U.S. security umbrella were willing to give 100% support to this goal. Whether somewhat reluctantly (due to so many established human rights norms being undermined) or not, it is clear that all nations in a relationship with the U.S. decided to give this goal their full support until it was met.

The present situation in Ukraine is an integral part of the furtherance of this goal on many levels and displays the degree to which the European powers lend their full support to the USA despite any harm to their economies this may do. The genesis to the seeming madness of escalating toward a potential nuclear conflagration lies in the factors spoken of above. The goal being sought is of such overarching importance to the political elites of the USA and its allies that no Plan B is contemplated. This is an ‘all or nothing’ project. As seen from the western elite point of view if they fail in this endeavour there can be no coming back from such a failure, their level of influence will be catastrophically weakened.

Why is this important for them?

The western powers have held sway for generations, they’ve been top dogs and believe this is their rightful status. They have convinced themselves that only they have the ‘right stuff’, the supreme ability to guide and guard all the nations of our world, and to discipline them whenever necessary. These attitudes stem from many sources including mythologies of exceptionalism and superiority, sometimes expressed as ‘The White Man’s Burden’. These myths have been embedded so deeply and been believed in for so long within the U.S. and UK cultures particularly that they are no longer seriously questioned at an elite level. 

In the USA the mythology underpinning exceptionalism is particularly strong emanating from the history of those oppressed pilgrims who arrived on North American shore and founded the “perfect” political and moral backdrop which many others in later years believed in so much they considered it was their ‘duty’ to bring their benefits to all others across the globe. In Britain the British Empire, was underpinned by a similar belief in the general superiority of the british over inferior cultures, nations and forms of governance.

With all targeted individual, nations, leaders and forms of government not conforming with western requirements there will remain one significant problem, the possibility that forms of behaviour and modes of thought will arise that could potentially threaten the “perfect” world they had fought so hard to create. It is certain that a vast number of the defeated would not agree at all that all was now perfect within a perfect world with all their previous leaders and institutions replaced, so the need to keep an eye on such people and seek to eliminate them to stop them gaining any vestige of power if left to their own devices would be strong.

A global police state ethos would inevitably emerge with propaganda used as a means of telegraphing the fear of the elites into populations and the assisting in the necessity of creating a citizen-reporting culture far outdoing the present cancel culture. Strict controls on speech and media would accompany such measures. And every channel of communication or action would be monitored at as great a depth as possible that would far outdo the considerable powers that the NSA now have.

You get the picture I am sure.

Currently the goal has its emphasis in weakening Russia with a view to undermining and replacing its present form of governance.Then China and concurrently all other nations that do not conform with western requirements. Those others you will already know something of concerning western attempts to undermine them: Iran, Syria, Cuba, Venezuela, Bolivia, Nicaragua and a number of others. Each one of these, led by China and Russia represent incalcitrant nations requiring extreme modification and replacement of their systems of governance by whatever means are deemed most effective by the USA and its allies.

A multipolar world where there is a general tolerance for most if not all modes of government and where trade, cultural exchange, economic and financial agreement replace enmity and where sovereignty is sacrosanct free from outside attempts to undermine national modes of being protected by the tenets of the United Nations is unacceptable to the USA and its allies. They have anointed themselves as world’s managers, and since 9/11, its warders. They provide themselves with the ‘right’ to override the sovereignty of others, to flout international law as they see fit and to dominate each and every aspect of others’ lives in their interests, including the right to threaten, sanction, subvert and violently attack any nation as they see fit according to their needs.

These are the aspects that should inform every one of us regarding why it is so very vital that neither Russia nor China be undermined, defeated, weakened or otherwise limited in their ability to lead all nations wishing to retain their freedom and sovereignty. Should they fall then I am confident that you can clearly perceive what will then follow… the inevitable establishment of a virtual prison planet from which the western powers will then ensure there is no possible escape.