THE WEST IS INCAPABLE OF ESCAPING ITS OWN CATCH-22

The West wants too many things to go its way to allow anything much to go the way the world requires for its future safety.

It has in its sights nothing less than that no other forms of government exist than those seen in western nations.

Yet it is faced with what are fairly clearly insurmountable problems in achieving this goal.

In recent years it has used violence to disturb the existing status quo of a number of nations.

This may be seen by some western elites as moving them a step or two toward the goal envisaged above. But how satisfied can they really be when the results are yet so very, very far from the dream scenarios (indeed their delusional scenarios) of societies that mirror their own in political terms?

Yet the goal remains:

No other forms of governments on the planet except those seen in western nations.

This goal appears sacrosanct. Why do I say this?

Because though there is obvious intent to do SOMETHING about other issues which trouble us as a species they are clearly unwilling to fully engage with those whom they intend to destroy.

The decade-long war In Syria was made immensely worse by the apparently sacrosanct goal to dislodge Assad and the entire superstructure of the Ba’athist Party from power (as was done in Iraq and Libya). This goal remains today in spite of all evidence showing the elites of the West and its allies in the region lost the campaign to achieve it. It must surely be known that the Syrian people cannot in all conscience be left to die in devastation, denied any ability to rebuild. The sanctions imposed on Syria make its rebuilding impossible except at a snail’s pace.

The emotional commitment to undermining Assad and the security apparatus of Syria is so strong and so little thought is given to the subsequent collapse of all order (as seen in Libya and to some degree in Iraq) that the policy is untenable in any direction other than to allow a system of governance that does not mirror those of the West.

This determination to attain the goal described above is so strong that it if nothing changes it will massively hinder any forward progress of the world in facing the immense threats that loom on the horizon and which quite clearly hinder that progress currently in regard to Covid-19.

The resistance against Sputnik-V is a case in point. Because it is perceived in the West that Russia does not sufficiently meet the criteria above regarding democracy many who would be positively affected by it and whose lives could well be saved by it are denied the Russian vaccine.

In regard to the issue of human-caused climate change the case is of course much stronger.

By holding fast to the goal of transforming all nations into political mirror-images of those in the West no matter what it takes and maintaining that as a sacrosanct dogma western elites are playing with the lives of millions.

Achieving unity of purpose across the world in the face of a common threat such as climate change and much else would clearly and obviously make a significant contribution to understanding generally. But this is denied the world due to the West’s ultimate goal. It dare not improve relations as this puts off it perceived necessity to maintain an aggressive position towards these nations in the hope of succeeding in the primary goal.

No doubt western elites see the need for urgent action in the face of a time for humanity when multiple dangers of enormous power threaten us. yet they cannot square the circle required to accept nations as they are and move forward in cooperation with them. In this way they increase the likelihood that no adequate solutions will be found or agreed upon, that the world will remain divided and most likely become more so. Resources such as water will be fought over rather than shared through agreements made if the intransigent and divisive western mode of operation wins the day.

I see few signs that the U.S. is willing to countenance allowing the present diversity of national governance to exist without a constant effort to undermine any form not reflecting so-called ‘western values’... no matter what disasters may befall us as a species.

It’s all or nothing and a one-way track in most cases.

In Afghanistan, after twenty years trying to buck reality, the U.S. has finally accepted it. There was no way it could significantly alter the reality of Afghanistan and transform it into anything resembling a western democracy. Does it really have to reach this stage in every case? For it will, eventually. Yes the U.S. and its allies such as the United Kingdom can attack and undermine even more nations in the Middle East. They are relatively easy meat. But others are proving more resilient, Venezuela, Cuba, Bolivia and Nicaragua for instance and certainly Russia and China.

Until the USA, the UK and their allies give up on their massively destructive and unattainable goal of transforming all nations in the world to mirror images of their political systems we will remain in this impasse where threats grow larger and humanity weaker.

It’s a Catch-22 the West simply seems incapable of escaping from. It will clearly go right down to the wire to levels for others of totally unlivable chaos, division and discord where populations suffer immense and continuing deprivation before it even considers trying.

By then it could all be far, far too late for humanity to recover.

 

DESPITE THE FAÇADE, OBSESSIVE SOCIOPATHS CLEARLY RUN THE WEST

For those with eyes to see it is obvious.

The completely dysfunctional and destructive policies are right there in front of us all.

No sane men or women could produce the level of discord, aggression, antagonism, economic failure and belligerent warmongering we have seen for decade after decade.

That there is something fundamentally wrong is totally obvious, despite a wall-to-wall media campaign that constantly tries to say all’s well and that there’s nothing to see here.

You don’t get the chaos seen in the West which exists at almost every level now unless sociopaths are at work. And the fact that they have reached the upper echelons of western society should come as no surprise.

The ethos of the West is exemplified in the notion that everyone should be free to rise to whatever position in society they are capable of. This sounds all well and good until you begin to consider what motivates a sociopath and what methods they are willing to use.

Sociopaths, considered to amount to around 1% in any population, absent any feeling of ethical constraint to their desire for wealth or power cannot help but find it relatively easy to rise in such a society that lauds this rise and places few restrictions upon it.

The sharp elbows and silver tongues of sociopaths mean they have few personal or social constraints upon them. I am not talking of serial killers here, these are socialized beings. They simply share the lack of emotional connection to others that serial killers are known to lack. They may appear to some to be good managers, hard individuals who drive others relentlessly to greater performance levels or who are brought in to to make redundancies ruthlessly and without emotion hindering their task.

Sociopaths have an entire arsenal of skills based on a willingness to say absolutely anything whether true or completely false. This gives them an edge over those who prize some degree of integrity. In office politics or otherwise they have a keen sense of how to play others. They can spot and exploit weaknesses and engage in machinations others would balk at. Having no interest in the feelings of others they play hard ball and play to win at all times.

Is it any wonder that these beings migrate up the chain of command in western society in inexorable style? Imagine these power/wealth-hungry beings, whose existence is well known in the field of psychiatry, acting out their determination to rise in whatever field they’ve chosen, day after day, decade after decade. Is it a surprise then that the West has the society it has or the foreign policies we see displayed daily?

It would be a surprise if it were otherwise.

The main factor which makes such an obvious reality cloudy is the way mass media is embedded within the reality the sociopaths have created. Naturally enough mainstream media is deeply embedded within the society it purports to report on. The news broadcasters we know all too well today, such as the BBC and CNN, are animals bred within the same cage.

As Noam Chomsky has pointed out, a filtering system exists whereby those with the views and attitudes which fit are accepted within them. Those who are outliers with views which would not fit well are largely excluded. This is why we see these latter individuals remaining independents, outside of the one-narrative viewpoints of state and corporate news media.

Within establishment news there are only openings for those who will protect and nurture the veil of lies that purvey the notion that the West is best and its elites well motivated, doing their level best, to be trusted and indeed lauded for their attempts to spread freedom and democracy.

This mirage, this façade of lie upon lie, of nuanced conditioning to massage a smile upon the grinning and bloody skull of western foreign policy, is reinforced every minute of every day across the western world.

Behind the manipulated ever-smiling and saintly visage those with eyes to see perceive the ugly reality. The illusion being created leaks heavily at all sides. Blood seeps from under it. But only for those with eyes to see. For many everything seems utterly normal, they are inured to accepting this is the way it is and believe (more or less) that all’s well... or at least 'normal’.

They say shit always rises to the top, well sociopaths do too… inevitably. Who is going to stand against them in this day and age when only a shallow patina of respectability is required and the dynamic, loud, and bold individual with great promises on his or her tongue is considered the obvious front runner?  

How many are fueled by an urgent desire to help mankind when they enter politics. No doubt a few. How many survive the hard reality of back-stabbing and betrayal they experience to go on to high office? How much easier it is for the conscience-free back-stabbers and Machiavellian sociopaths who, without a trace of empathy for their fellow beings, can wheel and deal at will.

Those who have the entire spectrum of deceptive devices to use as verbal missiles against all others. And abundant manipulative powers to fine tune their success through whatever corrupt means they choose? Truly, what chance have the good to rise in such a milieu in such circumstances and if they do, for how long?

You can imagine this 1% and their progress within western societies quite easily if you try. And you can easily spot the effects of their rise also... if you are one of those with eyes fully open, free of the daily conditioning mass media glosses over the yes of many.

The truth is frightening. Those in the western world live within a mental asylum run by those who should properly be mental patients. That’s a very uncomfortable reality. But I feel sure you will have seen just how true it is and what a predicament is now faced by those who recognize it.

The individuals running the West are insane. True, they don’t act like those seen in the film 'One Flew Over The Cuckoo’s Nest’, but clinically insane they are nonetheless. They have reached the highest positions possible with ambitions to control and have more unassuaged. Their motivation is eternally combative, always self-congratulatory and eager to deceive for gain, willing to use anything, including military might to get what they can never have enough of, wealth and power.

These are obsessive sociopaths, blind to all but their own ambitions. They have reached the highest echelons of wealth and power in the West by all means they deemed “necessary” and are now using those same means and more in a never ending war against all other nations to remain dominant to the nth degree.

These are the terminally destructive forces that fuel the West’s ambition to control the world and dominate it. These are the promoters of exceptionalism and 'America First’, the purveyors of the empty words 'Freedom’ and 'Democracy’ behind which lies 'Slavery’ and 'Dictatorship’.

Despite the attempts of mass media to gloss over their existence and that of their effects, these are the obsessive sociopaths who quite clearly run the West. 

AUTHORITARIANISM & THE ONE NARRATIVE NATIONS OF THE WEST

Which countries are truly authoritarian?

We are told by western elites that the West is gloriously free. Why is it then that the trend in the West is increasingly toward ensuring only one side of any geopolitical story gains prominence and that those deigning to express another point of view are subject to attack?

Why is it also that it is in the West that we predominantly find militarized police? Aren’t Russia and China supposed to be those who clamp down on protesters most ruthlessly? However, you will be aware by now just how many are killed by cops in the USA year on year. Yet China gets relentlessly criticized for supposedly draconian methods in both Hong Kong and Xinjiang where protests have been extremely violent... yet, not a single person has died through police action in either case.

The attempt to suppress and denigrate alternative viewpoints to the official state narratives of western nations is ongoing. Social media giants are being pressed harder and harder to eliminate so-called ‘fake news’ and ‘disinformation’. The problem is that what is considered ‘fake news’ and/or ‘disinformation’ has increasingly been anything that doesn’t reflect the official line, the agreed narrative of western elites and their media stenographers.

On Syria, on Russia, China and on issues such as Covid where western states have pronounced a judgement, if you are a prominent enough influencer you will find yourself in hot water if you get too vocal in expressing an alternative view.

A vast panoply of sycophantic state supporters with a vested interest in maintaining the status quo at all costs is ready and very willing to verbally pounce on anyone with a degree of popularity who evinces a view that fails to correspond with the “truth” as agreed upon in the upper echelons.

If you watched the shenanigans which took place during the 2020 U.S. presidential campaign you will hopefully have observed the trashing of Tulsi Gabbard. It was spectacularly methodical in its crushing power. I am unaware of anyone in the elite echelons of politics or media coming to her aid with a few helpful words concerning freedom of speech and everyone being entitled to a point of view. The consensus was clear. The narrative she was contradicting was believed in rock solid form. For those within the righteous echelon of state narrative believers there was no doubt it and they were right and anyone saying otherwise must be... a ‘Russian Agent’, an ‘Assad Apologist’, a ‘Useful Idiot’ and so forth.

When an entire elite superstructure has the power and intent to destroy anyone who deigns to contradict the accepted narrative then you have a very real authoritarianism, not only from those at the highest level, but those well down the hierarchy among the ultra-powerful mass media broadcasters who have the ability to make, or break you.

Tulsi Gabbard was not perfect. She made mistakes along the way. However, those who know something of the reality behind the facade of western elite narratives are aware that she spoke more truth than all of those set against her put together. Therefore, the truth not being welcome to the party she had to be denigrated and slandered to the point of propaganda sure to put enough doubt about her in the public mind to end her chances.

If we are to believe this is how freedom of speech and democracy works in the USA then we can surely see just how alloyed those aspects of U.S. life have become. Clearly you have to toe the line and say what’s expected, praise the foreign policy of the USA as wholly right and without fault, repeat the correct mantras and end with a “God Bless America”. Anything less and you put yourself at risk of being attacked by the most powerful people around who have the loudest megaphones available to the point where you are beaten into submission or driven to withdraw from the fray.

How much more authoritarian is all this than the reports about Russia or China that greet our eyes and ears on a routine basis? Yet the same blanket facade of righteousness means that even a whiff of criticism that this is even vaguely authoritarian will see those saying so targeted as above. It is a vicious circle where blindness is rewarded and actuality of insight punished.

As the saying goes, there are none so blind as those who WILL not see.

And those who will see nothing but their own self-protecting prejudices are the most blind of all. And the most authoritarian. They belong to nations they would have act out of this very blindness and prejudice, killing thousands without compunction because they see only rightness in their conduct. They belong to the damned, to the eternally conscience-free killers who perpetually assert only one single view and who forever sing the inviolate praises of all one narrative nations who collectively comprise the West.

A NAZI TROPE, NOW RECYCLED FOR USE BY WESTERN ELITES

It’s all very familiar.

They are different from us. They may seem successful, unified and good at what they do. But they are evil and threaten us.

Be afraid, be very afraid.

In Hitler’s time it was the Jews.

In Biden’s time it is the Chinese and the Russians.

They are the new ‘others’, the far lesser beings, the perpetual threat and the new candidates for elimination so we can prosper.

The connections to racism and fascism are obvious.

We are the superior western race, we are exceptional, the guardians that is all pure and good.

Those with inferior minds and ways threaten us with their insistence on following a different path.

This is an all too familiar mentality.

One of Hitler’s most trusted lieutenants and committed Nazi, Hermann Goering stated the techniques involved perfectly.

“Why of course the people don't want war. Why should some poor slob on a farm want to risk his life in a war when the best he can get out of it is to come back to his farm in one piece? Naturally the common people don't want war: neither in Russia, nor in England, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But after all it is the leaders of a country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy or fascist dictatorship, or a parliament or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the peace makers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.”

These techniques have worked all down the ages.

The medieval pogroms against the Jews enlisted them. They were ‘the other’, too successful, too unified and seen as a threat and affront to the accepted norms of those persecuting them. There was also the possibility of financial gain in doing so. You could replace them, have the jobs and access to wealth that they vacated.

Think of China in this respect. The USA and UK see their opportunity to undermine a fast rising economic power that threatens both their own economic strength and influence and which, if eliminated would boost them to new heights and establish their domination.

Human nature has hardly changed an iota over the millennia. The same obsessions prevail, the same evils rise when ambitions and desires become paramount driving ethical conduct and notions of morality to secondary status.

When Richard the Lionheart took an army through Europe seeking to attack and occupy Jerusalem by driving the Arabs of Saladin out he used these techniques to convince lords along the way to join him and to supply troops, sustenance and financial support to this “noble” quest against the Arabian savages. These “savages” were living in peace alongside the Christian population in Jerusalem at the time. But were described by Lionheart as evil sub-humans who enjoyed the taste of Christian blood taken from freshly butchered Christian babies. This early piece of fake news worked exceedingly well in garnering troops to the cause and in the conscience-free slaughter of any Arabs encountered.

It’s an old and bloody trail from the days of the Crusades through the pogroms against the Jews in medieval times to the Nazis and the holocaust. It continues today through the likes of Pompeo, Bolton, Trump and Bannon and this perennial flower of division, fear and hatred is again resurrected by Biden, Blinken and any number of activists who can be counted on to sow the narrative far and wide. Fear of the ‘other’, the strange, the non-conforming threat that can be made to pervade minds and generate an acceptance, indeed a lust for war, is active again among us.

 

WESTERN VALUES AND ADHERENCE TO A RULES BASED ORDER. REALLY??

Certain catchphrases appear always to be agreed upon where the top echelons of western political elites meet. And once the required hymn sheet has been selected for a particular era the western elite choir tend to sing from it faithfully and without fail.

Whether those elites appear in the rose garden of the White House, sitting around conference tables in Brussels or at NATO HQ they make sure they echo whatever memo has emerged to assign them an agenda and the semantic narrative to be followed.

Whatever the chosen target for regime change is there is always a particular meme designed for broad distribution. Reagan had ‘The Evil Empire’ and ‘The Free World’. Bush had his ‘War on Terror’ and the entire spiel of an entirely innocent USA wronged by vile evil-doers. Obama used the sanctimonious tones of America the Exceptional and 'Yes We Can (Destroy Libya). Trump and Pompeo, in their brain-challenged ineptitude and creative vacuum could only hurl pathetic insults and slanderous allegations at China.

But what has emerged from the Biden administration? Some new innovative language? Hardly.

Only a series of constantly repeated sound bytes that echo Reagan’s 'Free World’, a cascade of noxious lies and hypocritical, self-awarded plaudits.

The quest is clearly to set western nations as the exemplars for others to be judged against. And for those judgements to gives the thumbs up of approval to western elites. International law can be bypassed once more due to those other nations falling so far below western standards as to be fair game. The green light to be given to attack them on whatever level will do most damage.

Among these sound bytes awarding the West 'best’ status are the following:

‘Western Liberal Values’ often shortened simply to ‘Western Values’. The current regime change targets ain’t got ‘em. The phrase “they don’t share our values” is a dead certain sign that whatever nation is being talked about is having a war waged against it of one kind or another by the West. It seems this is enough to have a cabal of nations gathered against you now. One of the West’s “values” is apparently ignoring international law which requires that a nation attack you before you have the right to attack them. But what does international law matter to western elites? They have assigned themselves above such inconvenient barriers to their desires.

Which brings us to ‘Rules Based Order’, yet another soundbyte you will hear. The West adheres to this apparently. Though the many illegal wars it has perpetrated in recent times (see above for the legitimate justification for one) belie the claim that the West adheres to any such rules based order. Those western elites accuse of not abiding by this rules based order, i.e. Russia and China were ironically two out of the three nations who opposed the West’s illegal regime change wars. Spinning lies doesn’t get much more iniquitous than the way western elites do it, they are past masters.

The pose then is of a free, noble and ever-innocent West, always acting with the very best intent adhering to set rules and acting as the indisputably pure guardian of the very best values possible.

How many who have seen the filthy underbelly of life in the USA and UK can recognize the statement above as fact? How many who know of the Madoff’s, the Epstein’s, the Saville’s, the financial wheeling and dealing, the Opioid epidemic, the Covid chaos, the porno paradises, the drug, gambling, prostitution, the war mongering, hyper-capitalist exploitation, corruption and political insanity can recognize that statement above as fact?

Western values? Really??

A Rules Based Order? Ask any Afghani, Iraqi, Syrian, Libyan or Yemeni about that claim.

The truth is that western elites create a facade of self-promoting lies to promote their iniquitous wars, and the above are simply the latest.

Most human beings have similar values. A good education for their children. Decent life chances where stability and peace are present are valued highly along with access to employment and health care.

What have western elites brought anyone in recent years?

In the Middle East for instance?  None of the above. The reverse of the above in fact.

The claims western elites make for their societies ring hollow, they are merely a very cynical exercise in the manipulation of western populations and a synthesis of think tank propaganda prepared to endlessly wage war on others.

As George Carlin memorably said: “It’s all bullshit folks, and it’s bad for ya.”

What values come to mind when you think of the West?

And what western elite ‘rules based order’ can you discern?

Any at all?

 

EARTH'S FUTURE PARADIGM: PRISON PLANET OR TOLERANCE FOR DIVERSITY?

For all their talk of an intent to spread freedom and democracy around the world the political elites of the USA have as their number one aspiration to control and dominate our planet.

The primary driving force behind this objective is fear, fear of uncontrolled individuals and nations similar to those which enabled the events of 9/11 2001.

These elites have an uncontrollable desire to make the USA 100% safe at all costs, and the costs are certain to be borne by the rest of the world while also affecting the general population of the USA.

Much of the technical network designed to monitor Earth’s population is in place. U.S. satellites circle us, eavesdropping on us constantly along with the NSA and others within North America’s intelligence and security apparatus. Much more is undoubtedly in preparation. Space flights where payloads are confidential are a regular feature of a section of the NASA program.

But the U.S. elites have a problem which their regime change program is designed to remove. This is the barrier that certain nations pose to their goal of knowing and controlling all that goes on here on our planet. China poses the largest barrier, then Russia. After these two come Iran and other weaker powers which are failing to submit to U.S. requirements and command.

Make no mistake about it, these elites, aided and abetted by those in the UK mean to know everything of significance that goes on. They wish to circumvent any and all possible threats and the only way they can feasibly do that is by a system of overarching, totally invasive surveillance of all telecommunications.

The network to do the above is, as previously said, already in place. It will be constantly enhanced, both on land, sea, air and space.

What is not yet in place is control of nations not willing to accept that they must bow to the USA in respect of all aspects of their political life or economic systems which could in any way pose a threat of any kind to U.S. power and control.

The elites of the West have always considered themselves exceptional, the civilized powers, those who the world depends upon to remain stable and at peace. They consider they have the best possible systems, values, institutions and structures. What they do not accept and will never allow into their consciousnesses is that they are also the most pernicious and destructive, the most exploitative, manipulative and controlling of powers. Their past history of slavery, genocide, colonialism and war shows this clearly.

For all the reasons stated above it is vital that primarily China and Russia continue to move forward, to maintain their technological prowess, build their economies in unison, connecting and reinforcing each other. In addition, to help preserve the sovereignty of those other nations under threat from the USA such as Iran, Syria, Venezuela, Nicaragua, Cuba and others they must find ways to build stronger connections with them also.

Space will arguably present the greatest challenge of all to both sides. The virtual war to have the strongest presence there will be one of the hardest fought. That is why the news of a Chinese space flight today to continue work on China’s new space station is so important. The USA must not be allowed to dominate the world from space. The proposed Chinese-Russian station on the Moon will also play a vital part in ensuring there is no such domination.

I repeat, the overarching goal of U.S. elites since 9/11 has been to gain full oversight across the planet, to intercept every communication with a view to determining its effect on the USA or its allies and to nullify that effect in advance. This will in effect make a prison planet of our world.

If China, Russia and the other sovereign nations now refusing to bow to the wishes of the West’s elites lose out in the present quest to maintain their freedom we will find ourselves always aware that we are being monitored day and night.

If China, Russia and the other sovereign nations now refusing to bow to the wishes of the West’s elites win and succeed in denying them their fervent desire to monitor and control us then they will be forced to allow tolerance for diversity. This would mean we would then maintain our freedoms and not be dominated by a single power, or a group of powers; the USA and its allies.

It really does come down to this in the end:

1. A PRISON PLANET

or

2. A PLANET WHERE DIVERSITY IS TOLERATED

Our common future as a species depends on what will occur in the next decade before us.

The continued rise of China, Russia and their allies will guarantee the emergence of outcome 2.

The desire of western elites to technologically and militarily enslave us winning the current war will guarantee the emergence of outcome 1.

 

THE MURDEROUSLY DELUSIONAL UNIVERSE OF WESTERN ELITES

To understand just how cut off from reality western political elites are you must attempt to see the world as they do (or as they profess to).

Attempt as best you can to get into the following mindset:

You hold that the values of your nation and its allies are the only correct ones and symbolize democracy and freedom.
(This despite vast levels of corruption, fraud, exploitation and obvious degradation.)

The past acts of your nation and its allies were all done with the very best of intentions.
(This despite all the lies told, the massive loss of life caused and fracturing of the entire Middle East.)

You believe you have the right to judge the world based on your own self-awarded status as world leader.
(This despite no authority having agreed ceding any such authority to you.)

When torture and abuse of prisoners takes place you say it is only due to the behavior of  a few ‘bad apples’.
(This despite official guidelines on using the ‘enhanced interrogation’ techniques employed.)

Your nation and its allies abide by international law at all times.
(This despite the nations you attack never having militarily attacked you.)

You believe you have the right to interfere as you wish in the internal affairs of sovereign nations.
(This despite your repeated statements that no others should ever do this as it is criminal and reprehensible to do so.)

You believe you have the right to condemn, criticize and seek punishment for other nations.
(This despite your nation opting out of the International Criminal Court and sanctioning its members if they seek to investigate war crimes committed by your troops.)

You can deploy your military in any location across the globe, including in the proximity of those you name as adversaries.
(This despite your outraged anger if any other nation does anything remotely similar.)

You wish to free all nations from dictatorship and authoritarian rule.
(This despite your nation having allies such as Saudi Arabia that are absolute dictatorships you are loath ever to criticize.)

You believe yourself a suitable source to criticize the human rights abuses of others.
(This despite your history of genocide, slavery and support of human rights abusing states such as Saudi Arabia.)

You believe all you do is for the good of mankind and that you have a God-given mandate to use all means necessary to fulfill your mission and mold the world to your wishes.
(This despite your nation polling year on year as the most dangerous threat to world peace that exists.)

Western elites must adhere at all times to every one of the delusions and assertions above. It is necessary for them to do so as it gives them the self-awarded right to judge all others due to their purity of intent and act.

While within this belief bubble of self-perpetuated delusion heinous acts can be contemplated and enact with the self-assurance that no blame will be accrued or accepted within the elite western orbit.

In recent years all western media elites within the mainstream have agreed the view expressed above and seek to support it. No true journalism can take place as all the points above mitigate against it. Within this milieu of self-imposed delusion western elites are simply incapable of the perception of doing wrong, whether that means sanctioning, destabilizing, subverting, manipulating, slandering or militarily attacking other nations. In the mindset of western elites, whether within the political or media spheres all possible acts of war are justified due to the perpetual self-awarded sanctity of those engaging in them.

The delusional state described provides an allowance to engage in acts of war, surveillance, propaganda, the instigation and use of terror and terrorists and essentially any and all means deemed necessary to attain the goals of the “exceptional” and “saintly” states of the West.