HOW LONG WILL THE WEST'S PICTURE OF 'POOR INNOCENT UKRAINE' BE BELIEVED?

 

Western populations have been sold a completely false narrative on Ukraine.

The actual story would have revolted the sensibilities and relatively recent sensitivities of populations in the USA, UK and across Europe. It was necessary to paint a completely fake scenario which would appeal to those emotional vulnerabilities rather than cause them to question western elite priorities.

Did western populations even see the violence that went on in Kiev's Maidan Square through the winter months of 2013-14? Did they watch lightly-armed young policemen assailed by bricks, clubs, toxic sprays and Molotov cocktails, not to mention heavy chains and on one occasion by a fork-lift truck? I suspect not.

Where western strategic and national interests are concerned the press and media of nations such as the USA, UK and elsewhere have dispensed with their scepticism and have begun to placidly relay the state narratives requested of them. Unlike during the final stages of the Vietnam war there arose a new mentality among the owners, editors and so-called journalists of the establishment press and media in the West. Gone were the reports and articles questioning America's wars, gone was the journalistic neutrality of previous years. Western states were no longer being held to account for their actions but instead were given explicit support.

It was after 9/11 that western states could hardly do any wrong in the eyes of western mass media. To criticise them was to be branded as a puppet organisation for whoever the USA was attacking or invading. And as everyone agreed that the USA deserved total sympathy for the atrocity perpetrated against them it became quite unthinkable to question its motives or that of any of its allies.

One regime change operation after another followed 9/11 as we all know. In general none of the nations within 'The Coalition of the Willing as it was called had the nerve or inclination to question any of them. Not even when the fabled weapons of mass destruction of Iraq failed to show up. Naturally the media giants had to say something or other, but it was muted and delivered to a permanent stay under the nearest group-thought carpet from then on. There was to be no scepticism regarding U.S. foreign policy no matter what. The BBC and Guardian in the UK learned their lessons well and speedily became the stenographers for western states' official narratives.

So it was that when the USA, with EU compliance, saw an opportunity to intervene in Ukraine and engineer the subversion of the democratically-elected president and government of Ukraine they jumped at the chance. Despite the obvious attempt to bring them down using ultra-violence it was seen as too good an opportunity to miss. John McCain made his way to Maidan Square and joined the leader of a party that was once called 'National Socialist Party' and known for his Hitler salutes, on stage. The U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine, Geoffrey Pyatt and the Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs, Victoria Nuland showed their support for those attempting to bring the government and president down by handing out cookies on Maidan Square. They subsequently discussed who the replacements should be in a leaked phone conversation.

The above was bad enough, but more was to come and none of the reality brought about by any of these or subsequent events could be allowed to be communicated verbatim or with any degree of honesty to the American people or the populations of European states.

Once the deed was done and the democratic process in Ukraine was in complete ruins the western allies acted surprised when those who had been primarily responsible for voting in the departed president and government in elections confirmed free and fair by observers began to respond.

The people of Crimea and south-eastern Ukraine knew what to expect next as they knew the kind of people who had collapsed their democratic rights. They knew also what their next steps would be, to damn them for being Russian-speakers, to condemn them for their good relations with Russia just across the border, condemn them too for honouring the memory of their liberation from the Nazis by the Red Army and treat them as wholly second-class citizens in their own land, given the epithet 'Moskals', a word of derision and hate in western Ukraine.

Ukraine is a country split virtually right down the middle a little akin to the situation prevailing in Ireland. Two distinct cultures, identities, histories, mythologies and languages. The voting patterns in innumerable elections showed this fact explicitly. Ukraine is split in two, one side facing west, the other facing east.

The people of Crimea reacted fast and, asking Russia to help them held a referendum on reuniting with Russia, the country that had been Crimea's long-term home until arbitrarily given to Ukraine in 1956 by the then Soviet leadership. This decision to rejoin Russia was labelled a 'Russian Invasion' in the West with both political and media elites uniting to cry foul against the big bad Russians.

In the Donbass of SE Ukraine those under the threats enumerated above and who had lost their democratic rights along with the people of Crimea on Maidan took things into their own hands too. All administration buildings in the Donetsk and Lugansk regions were taken over and the Kiev-loyal administrators replaced. Not one person died as a result of this takeover.

The new authorities in Donetsk and Lugansk demanded a high degree of autonomy so that the legacy, culture and affiliations the people there held could be preserved in the face of the overwhelming antagonism of those who had taken power in Kiev. The response from Kiev was almost immediate with a military force being sent to quell the uprising and deal with any resistance using the full power of its military and attendant militias formed of the ultra-nationalists and neo-Nazis who had been at the forefront of the violence on Maidan.

The resulting bloodbath where unguided mortar shells were sent into the communities of the Donetsk and Lugansk regions hitting residential tower blocks, hospitals and schools along with town centres and suburbs went almost totally unreported in the West. Instead a fervent anti-Russian cover story was designed and deployed to portray a completely false picture of what was going on. I watched intently from the winter of 2013-14 to late 2018 when the worst of the carnage went on. The bodies lying in the streets of the Donbass and Lugansk were heartbreaking to see. Women, children, grandfathers and mothers, all civilians, lying dead in their homes or on the streets, children playing football in a school playground, the decapitated body of a teacher and much, much else besides. Not a word of any of these atrocities reached the front pages (or any pages in fact) of western press and no such images (even blurred ones) were seen on any western TV screens or laptops of those devoted to the BBCs or CNNs of this world.

The one-sided articles, television programs and documentary footage available from western establishment sources totally skewed all coverage of Ukraine to a simple and simplistic black and white image where Russia was all bad, Ukraine all good and the choice of each reader and viewer was there, ready-made with ample conditioning relentlessly repeated years after years right up to the very minute you read this.

Poor Ukraine. Hateful Russia! Nice, innocent, freedom-loving Ukrainians evilly attacked and invaded by brutal enslaving Russians. The diatribes, the invective and the jingoism of every western elite complementing every other elite narrative made the western world one giant propaganda soup. It can hardly cause any amazement or surprise that this whole enterprise had one inevitable destination, war and more war.

The infinite arrogance and irresponsible goals of the USA to eliminate all those who are rivals to its unlimited power and be sole global hegemon for its own self-interest and preservation has brought us to the brink of a world war. Russia has responded to all this in the only ways it knew how, by advocating peace through the return of the democratic rights of the people of the Donbass and the retention of their pro-Russian culture, historic legacy of respect for Russia and its language itself which is and always has been Russian.

All of the features above that relate to the 'other side' of this story, this tragic story of modern Ukraine, have been kept hidden from western audiences by intent. But with each new day showing just how resilient the people of the Donbass are, and the growing in strength of Russian resistance to western attacks, I do wonder now, how long will the West's picture of 'Poor Innocent Ukraine' be believed?

 

UKRAINE, THE WEST, WESTERN PUBLIC OPINION & WHAT MAY EVENTUALLY PREVAIL

 

Western elites in both political and media spheres appear to believe that the general public of the western world will eternally accept the one-sided narrative on Ukraine that they have been transmitting for so long now.

Early in 2014 after a bloodless revolution against the bloody revolution in Kiev a Ukrainian army and ultra-nationalist militants arrived in SE Ukraine to attack the regions involved.

The resulting bloodbath that was to claim at least 15,000 lives began with the setting up of mortars around the villages, towns and cities that had been relieved from Kiev control. Whether the Ukrainian army was directly involved or not, it is an indisputable fact that the randomly-fired mortar shells that hit the high-rise buildings in those locations, such as residential tower blocks, hospitals and schools, came from those doing the surrounding, not those being surrounded. Those mortar shells which flew past the high buildings landed randomly among the civilian population killing ordinary housewives doing their shopping or heading home thereafter, they hit men and women on their way from work or heading home, they hit town centres and essentially anywhere within the radius of those locations being surrounded.

Anyone thinking to any depth about the circumstances above must surely come to the same logical and common sense conclusion, that the figures quoted time and time again of fatalities by western news agencies give the wrong impression entirely by not communicating which side was responsible.

Before the hostilities initiated by Kiev the BBC showed a high degree of neutrality in their reporting of public feeling in the Donbass, the region of Ukraine where a frozen war exists today. They published two short videos which reflected the wish of the people of that region to have greater autonomy from Kiev, to retain their close relationship with Russia and their anxieties over what had just taken place on Kiev’s Maidan. Since that time the BBC has resolutely refused to broadcast any such material and had included itself in the general agenda of total censorship regarding the views of ordinary members of the public there. More than that it has transmitted only and continually the narrative that the entire crisis has nothing to do with the people there but that it is a crisis manufactured only by Russia.

From the beginning of hostilities until now the entire panoply of western mass media has adhered to the narrative above, that the Ukrainian crisis is not about the wishes of the people of the Donbass focusing totally upon Russia. This flies in the face of all good journalistic principles adhered to in past times. No neutrality or impartiality is evidenced at any time, no right of reply is accorded and the narratives broadcast are uniformly anti-Russian. In addition, as I saw myself through intently observing events in the region from the winter of 2013-14 to late 2018 no reporting of attacks, atrocities or war crimes by the Ukrainian army or militias were reported and attacks occurred on a daily basis with many killed and unconscionable atrocities occurred all too frequently. Yet the coverage was on almost all occasions non-existent most times with a bloodless, Kiev-narrative-oriented few words expressed at the most heinous crimes of all such as the attack on the Lugansk administrative building in June of 2014 when five women and three men died from a jet strafing it and the street before it.

The coverage of ‘Poor Ukraine attacked and invaded by Russia’ as the sole primary motif, the complete absence of reporting on murderous attacks on the civilian populations of Donetsk and Lugansk by the Ukrainian army, ultra-nationalists and neo-Nazi militants and the broadly based partisan anti-Russian stance continues to this day.

How long can the western powers maintain this deeply immoral and unethical approach where their populations are constantly fed only one side of all the many crucial issues involved? Truly the way this situation has been approached by the political elites of the West and their complicit allies within its mass media has delivered a killing field situation in the Donbass where the primary victims are continually silenced. This has produced an aura in the West which fairly precisely reflects the predictions of George Orwell in his novel, ‘1984’. The people of the western world and their allies are constantly fed a completely one-sided rendering of reality to reinforce their elites war aims and agenda. The narratives told, the myths conveyed, the talking points raised and the language used in each and every one amount to the deepest levels of conditioning seen since the Cold War and outdo those seen then in a great many respects.

At least during the Cold War there was a certain dialogue based on mutual respect and a high degree of needful diplomacy was carried out. There is only a pale shadow of any such activity now. Since 9/11 I would suggest the U.S. (and therefore all its allies) adhere to the premise that nothing (including diplomacy) should hinder the goal decided in the immediate aftermath of 9/11 that no rivalry of any kind directed at the USA was now tolerable and that subsequently the sources of any such rivalry must be completely eliminated. This is why I use the term ‘Ice Cold War’ to denote the lack of any true diplomacy such as that seen during the Cold War. In my considered view the USA and its allies and proxies have fought a final world war, what I refer to as an end game war to undermine, destabilize and ultimately eliminate all those seen as opposing total global hegemony by the USA. ‘Full Spectrum Dominance’ is the goal and nothing less will do. No opposition to this is to be tolerated.

The above being the case and western public opinion being relentlessly moulded to suit, what chance is there for anything approaching peace in our world? For how long will western populations remain in thrall to its daily conditioning? Is there any potential at all for a greater understanding to arise and a substantial protest movement arising against what’s happening? The potentiality for this appears low. Far too many still (even after all the lies told regarding Iraq and elsewhere) believe their politicians and western mass media sources and remain herded into ghettos of support for their activities. Then there are those permanently distracted by their own personal difficulties and/or pleasures within the stressful consumer societies of the West. Those few informing themselves on a deeper level do what they can to alert the general public but against the vast power of western mainstream media their efforts can do little. Though the tide of western public opinion is gradually changing in favour of a more neutral stance on Russia and often toward a positive one it is not enough to affect the overall geopolitical situation dominated by the powerful political and media elites of the West.

What hope then is there for an outcome regarding Ukraine that brings a resolution to its problems and not one purely benefiting the western world and those in the western half of that nation? In my view Russia may well have to take the Donbass region of Ukraine as western intransigence by the USA, UK, NATO, the EU and Kiev against any equitable pathway to peace appears total. Continuing war, in one form or another is quite clearly the option they prefer, with the recent statements of the Ukrainian president Zelensky emphasizing this without any room for misinterpretation. If this is not Russia’s choice and it continues to seek a peaceful settlement despite all the odds against it I can only hope that the continual rise of the Eurasian powers, primarily by China have an eventual effect that serves to encompass new spheres of influence extending into Europe whereby a wholly new geopolitical paradigm of agreement, emphasis on tolerance of modes of governance and trade ensues taking the place of territorial aggression and nationalism. This I see as the long term hope for peace. In the short term we see the harbingers of war all around us and leading the charge as ever, is the USA.

 

 

IT’S WORLD WAR THREE, STUPID

It is hopefully clear to everyone now that we are within World War Three. The optimistic notion that world wars were over with the end of the Cold War in the new era celebrated at the time where a New World Order was heralded can be seen to have been hopelessly optimistic. Of course it was a U.S. president who voiced this optimism, believing that it would be the USA that would now be perpetual top dog, the position it has always considered was its by right.

What has happened since has shaken the confidence of the USA that it was master of all it surveyed. The primary event which shook it most was 9/11. The project that followed could be reduced to the phraseology that it has now determined to be master of all it surveilles.

9/11 set in motion the quest to achieve ‘Full Spectrum Dominance’. This goal requires the neutralizing and elimination of all entities that could possible stand as rivals to U.S. supremacy. The ultimate goal is to have removed all individuals from power and all systems of governance from use that could in any way show any resistance whatsoever to overall geopolitical control of Planet Earth by the USA. Once all such elements and entities are eliminated then surveillance from space via all telecommunication mediums will allow monitoring, elimination and punishment that can regulate the world to ensure previous out-of-control never return to threaten the USA.

Unfortunately for the plans of the USA two primary problems have transpired. One is the recalcitrant nature of Vladimir Putin in not wishing to play ball and stating so baldly in Munich in 2007. The second is of course the unstoppable economic rise of China. A rise in economic fortunes equates to a rise in influence. It also equates to a rise in a range of powers that make regime change there by the USA a helluva lot more problematic.

The attacks upon and invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq were meant to open the door to many more such interventions, however, as we have seen this has not worked out at all well. The mimicking of the successful tactics of harnessing the use of militant extremists against the Soviet Union in Afghanistan was tried again in Syria. There Russia stepped in and stymied its full implementation, reducing the U.S. proxy forces to a rump in Idlib province.

This setback due to Russia has further infuriated those charged with seeing through the 9/11 goals. It is no wonder that Putin, for several reasons including his presenting an obstacle to U.S. plans in Syria is Public Enemy Number One in the West. From 2007 Putin was targeted as a thorn in the West’s side presenting himself as a clear barrier to the status of global hegemon it believed was its by right. Putin’s affrontery in halting the spread of terrorism in Syria was simply too much to bear. The unfinished business left over from the collapse of the Soviet Union could no longer be ignored.

World War III was therefore set in motion. First to fall was to be Putin and the system of governance in Russia. Once that was taken care of China was to be the primary focus until it too suffered the same fate. Meanwhile the lesser irritants such as Cuba, Venezuela, Nicaragua, Bolivia, Yemen and others cropping up would be targeted on an ad hoc basis with CIA teams for each kept hard at work with political help where deemed necessary. Nothing has gone well and certainly nothing according to plan. Trump’s attempt to subvert the political system in Venezuela was pushed very hard and given massive help by many nations worldwide... but failed. His attempt to undermine China failed also. Trump’s attacks on every single ally of Russia also fizzled out. Even his decision to allow lethal weaponry to be shipped to Ukraine (refused by Obama) turned out not to be crucial even there.

The USA is frustrated to the nth degree at this point. Russia has weathered the sanctions storm engineered after the reunification of Crimea with Russia, China is continuing to grow while the economies of the western world have taken a massive hit through the arrival of the novel coronavirus, Covid-19.

Time after time it seemed nothing was going right. Libya descended into internecine strife and an economy in free fall where human slavery returned. Afghanistan was lost in a chaotic bout of unconscionable humiliation. Internally too, the USA was riven by strife, most recently by the Black Lives Matter riots and protests and then the Capitol Building “insurrection”. Divisions and enmities show no signs of lessening either while the U.S. economy gets battered by the hurricane winds of inflation, further alienating the American people and setting the stage for more divisive drama to come.

Still the goal of world domination by the USA, ostensibly to ensure no such event like 9/11 could ever occur again, was pursued by doubling down on every occasion across the planet. The USA appeared to be fighting in almost every corner of our world and by whatever methods it pleased, no matter how immoral or unethical. It had shown this intent during the Bush years (kidnap {rendition}, imprisonment without trial {Gitmo} and the use of torture) when the methodologies used were whatever appeared to have efficacy, no matter how criminal they were in essence.

The set-in-stone, never to be questioned, limited, modified or (heaven forfend) cancelled, goal of global domination by the USA and its allies in perpetuity, supposedly for the benefit of all 'right-minded’ people everywhere, was the underlying principle of every geopolitical decision made. Russia was to be targeted in every way possible as first “problem” to be solved. Western mainstream press and media responded with alacrity. The ‘Get Putin’ campaign went into high gear. And from 2014 it had a golden #1 meme, Ukraine. The waterfall of propaganda, bias, partiality and spin permeated all mainstream news outlets which they ran with non-stop. ‘Russiagate’ was used as the primary vehicle for the ‘Demonize Putin/Russia’ for four years non-stop. The end result being that gullible souls who have no time or inclination to look further than the headlines and bylines were completely sold on the renewed ‘Red Peril’ scare.

Now we see serial doubling down regarding Ukraine from the USA, UK and western mass media. The hysteria generated is pervasive and though no ‘Russian Invasion’ has transpired it continues to be fueled by ever more wild rhetoric. To what end you may ask? A good question. Though the answer is undoubtedly composed of many parts at least a few are obvious. The destabilization of Russia in any way possible is ongoing and the so-called crisis in Ukraine is undoubtedly part of the open-ended campaign. No matter that the economy of Ukraine, already in near basket case condition, is driven into freefall and total collapse, the demands of the overarching goals set after 9/11 take precedence. And easily so. Ukraine is only of use as a pawn to the USA no other use than to create mischief against Russia.

World War III, the last world war, the one to determine the geopolitical structure of all our futures, overrides all concepts such as justice, equity, honor, integrity or fairness. The USA is unwilling to create a single such barrier to its ability to win out and reach the goal it considers it simply cannot tolerate NOT achieving. Full Spectrum Dominance equating to absolute control over all potential threats to it globally is not negotiable, cannot be watered down, must not be questioned but must be carried through to ultimate victory no matter what the consequences may be.

In the Nineties a slogan became very well known in the USA, one that sought to focus minds in the forthcoming presidential election:

“It’s The Economy, Stupid!”

Now, “It’s World War Three, Stupid!”

 

RUSSIA, TAKE THE DONBASS, IT’S THE RIGHT THING TO DO

 

Zelensky & Biden both need war, or at least the threat of war, to draw support for their flagging opinion poll ratings... which are descending rather speedily down the toilet.

These two are far from the brightest lights among an array of dim bulbs who can only flicker rather than flash. Perhaps Putin ought to give them what they crave, take the Donbass and light them up a tad?

No matter that western elites would go totally ape-shit, it’s looking increasingly like the right thing to do. More than that, it is looking like the *essential* thing to do, the right thing to do, the thing that can put an end to the current West-created impasse. With its back covered by China, Russia can pretty much afford to set the screwheads of western idiocy raving mad at him. Let’s face it, what more can they say about him they have not said a thousand times already? He can take it. He’s shown this innumerable times.

There’s an old saying, you may as well be hung for (stealing) a sheep as a lamb. Russia has something to lose admittedly, however, far less than when this all blew up due to U.S. and EU interference in Ukraine’s business back in the winter of 2013-14. Russia can just about afford the damage the western power will try to inflict upon her. She has gone through so much worse during WWII than the West could possibly do and that Stalingrad Spirit has not faded with the years. The Russian people have much the same mettle now as they did back then. Tradition has faced down modernity in most Russian households and the respect for the veterans of WWII lives on and provides a needed example for young Russians now.

The highest percentage of those in the Donbass are pro-Russian Russian speaker who know all too well that they would be far better off as part of the Russian Federation than they ever will be in Ukraine even if they live to be a hundreds years old or more. Besides, they feel so much closer to Russia, both physically and mentally than to those who would be their eternally greedy masters in Kiev or further into the depravities of EU nations (as they see them). The vast majority of those in the Donbass would greet Russian troops as liberators and greet them with cheers, hugs, flowers and loaves of bread with a sprinkling of salt.

Russia and the Russian people would weather the storm of rhetoric and attempted economic venom from the West in the event of Russia storming in. A lesson will have been taught NATO, a lesson the American architect of the Cold War containment policy of the Soviet Union, George Kennan would say was well deserved. He predicted back when the first three ex-Warsaw Pact states were welcomed into NATO that the day would come when Russia would be angered enough to refuse to tolerate any further encroachment. It appears that day has well and truly come.

Russia has been preparing for this eventuality. She has built up her defences making herself as immune as she can do for whatever the West throws at her. Putin has done his best to appear unperturbed while readying her defences. His crowning achievement may well be the development of the array hypersonic weaponry now standing ready to repulse any insane American Dr. Strangeloves who think Russia is a pushover.

Russia has established new, stronger and vastly more dependable trading partners and networks, chief of all that with China. After taking Donbass, if he should decide to, Putin will need to cleave ever closer to China and share military technologies as never before, get the second Siberia to China pipeline completed in record time and make official the loose alliance against the West that has borne such fruit in recent times.

The West, in the aftermath of Russia acting in its own best interests by taking the Donbass will be in disarray no matter how resolutely furious it may seem. Nations such as Germany, France and Italy will find its elites wetting themselves at the thought of going along with the USA and UK in their new super-sanctions against Russia. They know what Russia can do to their economies by return, turning off the gas tap, freezing them out as she turns to other, more agreeable, and much friendlier markets.

Russia’s true friends will stick with her, India, South Africa, perhaps a Lula renewed Brazil and above all of course China. Iran, Syria, Venezuela, Cuba, Nicaragua, Yemen and many others will stand cheering and applauding as Russia gives the USA and the EU a double whammy. Many will dance in the streets and wave Russian flags, even as far away as the Sudan and Mali. And naturally across Serbia and among the populations of the ex-Warsaw Pact nations where many still recall Russia with affection and despise the warmongers of the West.

All in all taking the Donbass more and more looks like the best thing Russia can do right now. Its pleas for understanding have fallen on stony ground, its hopes to be welcomed into a common European home, dashed. The long years of patiently waiting for the West to come to its senses and for the redundant, fear-based force of NATO to be disbanded, have ended. Russia has finally come to the terminal end of any patience it had now. Now it will act on the basis that its enemies are truly insane with no possibility of psychiatric treatment in sight. Only shock therapy has any potential for effecting a cure now.

Russia, take the Donbass, it’s the right thing to do!

 

UKRAINE: RUSSIA MUST NOW DECIDE WHICH IS THE LEAST WORST, & PERHAPS BEST OPTION

 (The Ukraine situation is down to the wire. The next few weeks may bring momentous events.)

All the relevant geopolitical facts are now in. Russia has received an answer to its demands that its national security red lines be observed.

The response has been overwhelmingly negative from both the U.S. state and NATO, Russia can expect no guarantees of its future safety and unhindered development. In addition Russia knows that it will continue to be a target as an adversary if not an outright enemy of both the USA and UK and the majority of those within the European Union, the chief antagonists among them being Poland and the Baltic States.

Russia can hope for no better than that which is offered now, some vague assurances from the U.S. that talks are possible regarding some form of agreements on lesser issues than those sought by it. From NATO all that was received is a shallow document permeated with ideological dogma.

You can read both documents, leaked in the last 24 hours, here:

NATO & U.S. response to Russia's red lines

Zelensky, president of Ukraine has also made his views clear in recent days. He has rejected the Minsk agreements which create a pathway to peace and reconciliation with both Russia and the autonomy-seeking republics. His rhetoric has been full of allusions to taking the path to war. Russia has been left in no doubt that the Minsk agreements are dead, killed off by Kiev and by the lack of any intention by the western powers to pressure Ukraine to make good on its promises to talk directly to the leadership of the republics or create federalized status for the Donbass.

There is no room for further doubt, nor hope. Russia has all it needs now to make the decision before it.

Whether to sit still and do nothing while Ukraine (and Georgia) move closer to joining NATO and further threatening Russia’s security and general peace of mind. It can allow a gradually increasing army of enemies to approach its borders with ever greater access to weaponry that can destroy targets within Russia in five minutes or less. Or it can take the offensive and secure the Donbass and effect the preservation of its largely pro-Russian population and ensure no NATO facilities, weaponry or troops ever sit on its border threatening it. It can take the fight to NATO in other words instead of hoping for some outbreak of good sense from it. NATO after all has every motivation to make the situation regarding Russia as fraught as possible, constantly needing to justify its need to exist.

Of course, if Russia does take this step (which it is largely being forced to by the West and the increasing threats from Kiev) it will face an uproar of criticism and immediate calls to hit it with every sanction and prohibition possible. Although German, France and Italy will not wish for Russia to be excluded from SWIFT this may well be demanded by the U.S. and Britain. Whether they will stand up to this pressure is uncertain, however, they know that crushing financial penalties will arise for themselves as well as any intended for Russia.

NordStream 2 would no doubt be refused its permit to activate natural gas supplies to Germany and onward to the rest of Europe. In response it is highly likely that Russia will cease all supplies to the nations attacking it. Any attempt by the West to find alternative suppliers have failed so far. Biden’s recent visit to Qatar in an attempt to secure a supply of natural gas to Europe instead of that from Russia will not be sufficient and analysts in the field agree that the Russian gas supply cannot be replaced as a whole.

Russia of course has prepared for the eventuality of an economic war now looming. Its relations with China are at an all-time high with cooperation occurring across a wide spectrum of economic and now military areas. A second pipeline from the Siberian oil and gas fields to China is currently being built and it doesn’t take any expert in geopolitics to understand what this portends for the future. Russia has created an alternative to SWIFT and has also readied an alternative to accepting the West-based internet system. Finding new trading partners was a vital necessity for Russia after the reunification of Crimea and the crisis in south-eastern Ukraine in 2014-15. This has been accomplished with a high degree of success. Russia has also arranged for alternative currencies to the dollar within its international trading network. Russia’s national debt is low. It has been reduced year after year and now stands at an historic low. Its holdings of the U.S. dollar have been massively depleted also and its holdings in gold have been built to significant levels enabling it to weather the most severe of economic storms.

Has Russia done enough to hold firm and survive the attacks that will inevitably be unleashed upon it if it decides to intervene in the Donbass? I suspect so. With Russians fully aware of the war being waged against it by the West, economic or otherwise, it is a reasonable assumption that they will rally to support their president and government. The ‘Stalingrad Spirit’ will obviously work to the advantage of the Russian authorities at every level and could well spark a greater entrenchment of anti-western policies resulting in the banning of western news entities, NGOs and much else. It will also mean a likely formalized military pact with China and quite possibly with others such as Iran, Syria, Cuba, Nicaragua and Venezuela. And who knows, perhaps even Yemen, the Sudan, Mali and others under threat from the USA, UK, EU and their allies.

We are at the brink of a hot war, the USA, UK, EU and others having chosen to support the coup in Ukraine and the relentless encroachment of NATO to Russia’s borders. The western powers have brought this situation into existence and, unwilling to do anything but double down while rejecting any credence being given to Russia’s needs for national security, they are driving Russia to make the most momentous decision of our lifetimes. Whether its interests lie in continuing to be aggressively oppressed on all sides, slandered mercilessly, treated as a pariah and with Ukraine constantly used as a battering-ram to destabilize it... or to use its now extremely efficient and professional military forces to rid itself of those who seek its demise.

These must surely be the thoughts being focused upon now in the Kremlin, weighing one option against the other to judge which may be the least worst option and more importantly which is the one that will safeguard Russian national security in perpetuity.

 

WORLD WAR III: IS THE END OF THE END GAME IN SIGHT?

 

This is of course no innocent game that the West is playing.

It is deadly serious and there are no rules to this “game” except ‘win at all costs’.

The winner determines the geopolitical future of the entire planet for all future years.

If it is the USA and its allies who win out we get a strictly monitored world, one where surveillance from space is ubiquitous; wall to wall and laptop to laptop, worldwide.

There will be no escaping global inspection and where necessary, individual/group correction.

To win this “game” the USA and its allies must nullify, eliminate and replace any individuals and nations not in compliance with the requirement for complete obedience and in perpetuity. No disobedience to the codes laid down will be tolerated. If you think cancel culture is bad just wait until the USA and its allies have complete global control. Blanket coverage of all possible rogue factors and elements will be a certain outcome and if you don’t mind your p’s and q’s then you will come to the notice of your overlords... and then heaven help you.

Those nations to be nullified and eliminated are fewer now than they were in the days immediately following 9/11 even while the number of individuals have increased. There has been much talk of regime change. Of course this was the primary goal, but not the only one. Along the way the secondary goal, recognized as easier to accomplish and a handy natural by-product of the regime change tactics used. This was the complete destruction of the economy of the nations targeted rendering them “safe”. Complete regime change was of course desired above all else, but economic destruction of those targeted would do almost as well.

Since Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and Syria, Sudan, Yemen, Cuba, Venezuela and Nicaragua have been worked on as side issues. The pot has been kept boiling while the next major target was softened up and made ready for containment, economic collapse and subversion from within, and if at all possible regime change. That major target is of course Russia. Once brought to heel with its president removed and system of governance replaced, the USA and its allies would move on to the ultimate target, which is of course China.

These latter two, Russia and China, are obviously the toughest nuts, hardest to crack by far. The others are relatively easy targets for subversion and a continual program of undermining acts of pressure including sanctions, internal activism, media manipulation and financial squeezing has kept them all suffering, and pleasingly so for the western masters of the end game. The powers they possess are immense and aided by the high degree of complicity they enjoy from their western mass media and European Union peers.

But now we reach the situation occurring currently. This is at the crunch point where the end game is reaching its most critical phase and an incredibly dangerous situation for both sides is underway, a situation that just may eventually determine the winner of the ‘End Game’.

Russia has recently raised the stakes after holding the West at bay for long enough to strengthen its hand. Its economy has been made more robust by responding vigorously to western sanctions and by diversifying its product base, finding new markets and connecting ever more closely with old allies. In tandem Russia has invested in new weapons systems that provide a more than fighting chance of responding to any western attack with a devastating reply. Hypersonic weapons of various kinds have been developed, tested and are now coming on stream and in use by the Russian military, army, navy and air force.

Russia has arranged for itself to arrive at a similar situation to that of China, strong enough to no longer have to watch its words when dealing with the West, no longer having to keep a low profile while western political and media elites create fake accusations and faux-scandals designed to harm Russia’s reputation and economy. Russia has weathered all the storms sent toward it and come out stronger and more resilient than ever before. Russia has now begun to make demands of the USA and its allies regarding NATO encroachment and the general aggression displayed constantly by the West over the last decade and half.

So, Russia is in a good position to resist the tactics of the end game war that the West has been waging. But is that position strong enough to withstand the end of the end game that is now coming into sight over Ukraine? This is where for both sides the risks have become enormous as what may be the final battle is now fought. Russia is determined to keep her borders secure and admit to no more threats looming on her doorstep and has demanded also that NATO forces be withdrawn to the positions they occupied as the Cold War ended and Gorbachev was promised NATO would not move an inch eastward toward Russia.

The danger for Russia is that the USA, its allies and NATO will simply double down and ultimately wage a hot war. However, the more likely danger is that some extreme provocation will force her to respond, and that this will provide a means by which the western powers can significantly damage her through an already prepared propaganda war. This has undoubtedly been readied and merely awaits other stratagems playing themselves out before implementation.

Currently the widespread western propaganda used daily regarding Ukraine is, in my estimation, designed to elicit one of a range of responses from Russia to weaken its stance.

These are the outcomes sought by the West as I foresee them. All would lead to one form of propaganda benefit for the West, dependent on Russia’s responses:

1. To push Russia into admitting its forces are in proximity to the Russia-Ukraine border contingent on a full scale military assault on the autonomy-seeking republics by Kiev. The propaganda value exists in any explicit admission that Russia would use military force in Ukraine if certain circumstances occurred. This is 'Gotcha #1'.

2. To push Russia to make a concession to “peace” and “deescalation” by withdrawing sufficient numbers of troops and weaponry from near the Russia-Ukraine to then allow the planned attack by Kiev/western embedded special forces on the autonomy-seeking republics with relative impunity. ‘Gotcha #2‘

3. To push Russia to withdraw its forces standing on guard near the Russia-Ukraine border at least partially and to then claim this as a major victory for NATO and a humiliating defeat for Russia. n addition I would be played as a sign of just how needed NATO was and a robust stance against “aggressive” Russia at all times. ‘Gotcha #3‘

Meanwhile of course, depicting Russia in the most pejorative of terms frightening corporate Europe and America into refraining from any deal-making with her. Weakening Russia economically and by so doing strengthening the USA is an active component of the overall strategy also. Each component of the overall stratagem gives the West a win and just possibly enough cumulative wins to shake Russia hard enough to enable an internal destabilization to begin and be supported by the NED (National Endowment for Democracy), the Soros’ Open Society NGO and of course the CIA and MI6.

So, what of the USA and its allies? What are the dangers for them in this situation?

There are several. One is that Russia continues to play ball and not react as predicted in the USA’s game plan. This could take several forms. One is the kind of pushback being seen currently where Russia makes a series of geopolitical chess moves involving perceived weak spots in the USA, and also within the economic sphere of its allies. The recent news that Russia will work in coordination with Cuba, Venezuela and Nicaragua on military matters is one such move. The deal with Hungary to provide it with a contract whereby it will have the cheapest natural gas in Europe until 2036 is another.

Russia has no doubt other cards up her sleeve with which to unnerve the USA and split its supposed European allies from it and adherence to its game plan. Already we can see Germany leaving the Biden fold over Ukraine, talking of wishing to establish a working relationship with Russia and refusing to countenance a refusal to grant the NordStream 2 its certificate of implementation. Others within the European Union will no doubt follow as their levels of available natural gas drop this winter.

The USA risks being isolated along with its rabid puppy, Britain if these trends continue to exacerbate and Russia fails to take the bait regarding Ukraine. This is decidedly NOT the outcome of the end game that the USA envisaged when it decided to use Ukraine as a tool to leverage its goals regarding Russia. And Ukraine is beginning to show all the signs of recognizing that it is being used in this way. The consequences for the USA’s present power level and influence could be severe if it is seen to fail catastrophically and subsequently also be seen as a conniving, deceitful, abusive and ultimately... incompetent partner

If the USA wins out using the Ukraine gambit Russia will be weakened and a much easier proposition for further inroads regarding the subversion of its political, economic and social stability. The push to the final goal whereby Russia’s president falls along with its government with both being replaced by U.S.-friendly alternatives, will be hastened. Those activists who look to Alexey Navalny within Russia will be emboldened and new converts gained in a renewed hope of replacing political elites they now feel more confident of toppling.

If Russia wins out the USA will be the one weakened, its reputation in decline, its influence reduced and to add insult to injury its allies beginning to negotiate new and more binding relationships with Russia. A potential political turmoil unleashed back home also cannot be ruled out. Russia’s position of course will be hugely strengthened and Russia will certainly attain the security guarantees she is looking for currently. Not only that, Russia will gain a significantly higher degree of respect, her position extremely secure and the western enemy sent home to lick its wounds. Plus the future of NATO will be in grave doubt.

It’s all to play for. Will the fake narratives of the USA be exposed? Will western populations continue to support their elites conditioned by these narratives? Will Russia resist all military provocations initiated by Zelensky or by the armed-to-the-teeth neo-Nazi militants, no matter the scale of the casualties? Will the USA’s European allies quail at the thought of Russia cutting off supplies of natural gas to them if they continue to obey their masters in Washington? How far is the USA willing to go in doubling down on its 9/11 fixed goal of eliminating all potential adversaries and economic rivals?

The next few weeks and months should tell us the answer to some, if not all, of these questions

And by then we should all know whether we are indeed in sight of the end of the end game war, of World War III, the final world war. The war to determine the geopolitical landscape of humanity in perpetuity from our time onward.

USA, UK & Co. (WARMONGERS INC.)

 

While the rest of the world has good trading relations with Russia the USA and its evil puppy, Great Britain continue to hurl abuse and accusations at her.

These two more than any other nations have caused widespread fear, death and destruction in recent years. Yet it is also these two who preen themselves as civilized and exceptionally peace-loving. Try to square that circle if you will.

There is a certain overweening arrogance in setting up as the world’s judge, jury and executioner but the irony of the two most bloodthirsty criminal nations doing so seems totally lost on them. Whatever the lies, whatever the brutality and perpetration of mass murder on an industrial scale, these two soldier on with halos firmly affixed.

How are these tricks of massive deception carried out with such aplomb, how do they get away with their flagrant abuse of international law with seeming immunity from prosecution and a global aura of impunity? Naturally it all comes down to the position of power over others that they have garnered to themselves over the years.

Centuries of exploitation, belligerence, threat, arm-twisting and unlawful punishments against those disobeying their commands have brought the USA and UK to this point. Plundering weaker nations of their resources (colonialism), and using them as a source of cheap or even free labor (slavery) has made them the dominant force for their own self-interest the world has ever seen.

Now their eyes are fixed on the last group of nations they have as yet not managed to subjugate to their will. Among them the chief candidates to be demonized, subverted, undermined and brought to heel are Russia and China, all the while keeping the regime change pot boiling under Cuba, Venezuela, Nicaragua, Yemen and several other targets for geopolitical elimination.

These two belligerents, global vandals, bullies and criminal aggressors do all this with not one iota of shame, not one whit of guilt, they conceive themselves to be righteous and vigorously defend the myth that they are bringing the world peace, freedom and democracy. These vainglorious destroyers of nations conceive themselves to be sanctified by God, no doubt the wrathful, vengeful and intolerant god of the Old Testament. Such is their devious blasphemy.

To fully encompass the insanity of these two wrecker nations in words, consumed as they are by a greedy ambition never to be satiated is impossible. The sheen of holier-than-thou smiles that they turn to the world as they slaughter challenges the power of mere words to portray. Their ineffably evil acts, delivered with sanctimonious self-righteousness makes the stomach turn, the mind to reel and the ability to encompass such depravity fail.

While most of the world seeks to get along nation to nation in peace, trading one with another and maintaining good relations whenever and wherever possible the USA and UK stand out in stark contrast. Their cancerous covert tentacles reach out and into every nation on the planet manipulating situations to their advantage, undermining, demonizing and subverting those who oppose them, threatening the good, and bribing the corrupt, until all do their will.

Should the tactics immediately above fail, then these jackals of worldwide criminality tell sufficient lies to manipulate a sanction for them to indulge in yet another orgy of violence, mass murder and devastating destruction, totally wrecking target nations and fragmenting entire regions.

These are the products of an insane breed of malignant spawn born in the West that have an insatiable appetite to attain a monopoly for their evil goods and services. Their wares bring death and destruction to those they conceive as their rivals and competition. Only complete domination will satisfy them in a market place where their intolerance and deadly insanity rules all.

These are: The USA, UK & Co. (a.k.a. WARMONGERS INC)