WHY IS VLADIMIR PUTIN SO HAPPY?

How many have watched any public address by President Putin of Russia recently? Those who have may have remarked to themselves, and even to others, on how happy he appears, how calm and composed, how comfortable in his skin he is, and confident in his style of address. 

Why might this be? Shouldn’t he be a little solemn considering that the western world is dead set against him? Not to mention that Russian soldiers are dying on the battlefront. Not nearly as many as Ukrainian soldiers, but certainly some. Of course there have been recent moments when he has been solemn indeed, as when he met with some of the wives and mothers of the fallen. But in recent situations where he has met other world leaders and given speeches, he has looked supremely well, happy and of a very cheerful disposition. Again, why might this be?

Over the past 15 months the leaders of the western world along with their allies have done their best to isolate Russia. More than that they have attempted to bring down its financial system along with its economy. Floods of western nations have taken the decision, or have been convinced, to abandon Russia and have no further dealings with the Russians. Cultural ties have been broken, broken also were educational links, certain authors, artists and other important personages have been made persona non grata, just because they are Russian. The wealth of many Russians who held money overseas has been frozen, yachts and homes have been confiscated and in general anything Russian has been subject to censorship, destruction or a ban.

Yet Mr Putin smiles on, apparently completely unfazed by any of these developments. He gives speeches with aplomb demonstrating no faltering whatsoever in his grasp of issues, detailed knowledge of facts and figures and with a mind obviously as sharp and at the same time, as playful as ever. And what about all these ailments he is said to have. Where are the symptoms? Why is it that he appears to be as ‘fit as a fiddle’ as they say? How can this be? Surely the countless articles, radio and TV programmes including those of the 24 hour news cycle who are depicting him as the world’s most evil monster are getting to him? Apparently not.

Every now and then a famous figure from western TV news channels is granted an interview with him. Every question implies he is engaged in wrongdoing of one kind or another. His answers are treated with an air of scepticism not to say cynicism, essentially insulting him even if it only implicitly. Does he get annoyed or irritated by this insulting behaviour? He does now and then show a flash of irritation, yes… but mostly due to the interviewer (interrogator) jumping in and interrupting him when he has not quite finished the answer he was given. But otherwise he is as calm as could be and always with that unassailable twinkle in his eye. This is surely not normal?

Why is this man, the object of all the West’s scorn and invective so apparently unaffected by it and indeed seems to grow happier by the day?

Here are the answers that most fit the bill in explaining this ‘Putin Phenomenon’. He is happy and contented quite obviously because things are going his way. It is because when it comes to the main things in his life, those things that mean most to him at the deepest possible level, everything has begun to fit perfectly in place according to his plans. Those plans are endlessly speculated about in the West, each assertion more off-target than the last. Newsprint and screen time products are required in a continual flow and like Trump in the USA, Putin in Russia generated viewers, readers and clicks. Without fail. But Putin’s plans are no secret. He has laid them on the table quite openly.

Plan 1

To make a normal neighbour of Ukraine, a neighbour that is neutral and no threat to Mother Russia, a nation without a trace of extremism where the military is virtually ceremonial and where NATO has no place.

This plan is going well, despite what westerners may continually be told. If it was not going well we would certainly see it in his face and manner.

Plan 2

To do all he can to unite the nations of the global south (and elsewhere such as Latin America) to a point where the USA and its allies can no longer bully, threaten, invade and undermine them. United to neutralise and dispose of the U.S. dollar as the world’s reserve currency and so undercut the ability of the West to weaponise the petrodollar through its illegal sanctions policy. The plan hinges of the unity that will give birth to a fully multipolar world, a world where the USA becomes just another power among many, a world where agreements not acts of aggression prevail.

Plan 3

To do all he can to build a strong and successful Russia where living standards are constantly on the rise due to a stable economy where Russian products of all kinds (not just oil and gas) find a ready market among friendly nations. To see Russia secure and accepted among all the nations that have discovered a newfound ability to shuck off American dominance who have lost their fear of annoying that nation into hurting them. In short to be among friends where each friend has the back of all others, among friends who engage with each other in trust, who share with each other and find ever more ways to strengthen the bond between them. This is what he plans for Russia.

These three plans, not set in any particular order, are all, to one degree or another, coming to fruition and can be seen by all (except perhaps westerners) including Mr Putin to be doing so.

These three successful outcomes so important to Russia are the three primary reasons why the man known as Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin is SO very happy these days. 

THE GREAT GAME CONTINUES… TO WHAT END?

History buffs and students of geopolitics will know the term ‘The Great Game’ well. For those who are not familiar with it, it was the name given to the geopolitical tussle between nations of the west and the east in the 19th century, namely between Britain and Russia.

Here is the Wikipedia definition:

‘The Great Game was a rivalry between the 19th-century British and Russian Empires over influence in Asia, primarily in Afghanistan, Persia, and later Tibet. The two colonial empires used military interventions and diplomatic negotiations to acquire and redefine territories in Central and South Asia. Russia conquered Turkestan, and Britain expanded and set the borders of British colonial India. By the early 20th century, a line of independent states, tribes, and monarchies from the shore of the Caspian Sea to the Eastern Himalayas were made into protectorates and territories of the two empires.

Though the Great Game was marked by distrust, diplomatic intrigue, and regional wars, it never erupted into a full-scale war directly between Russian and British colonial forces. However, the two nations battled in the Crimean War from 1853 to 1856, which affected the Great Game.’

As we can see today, there are definite elements of ‘The Great Game’ that continue to this very day and, in modern times, the British have been joined in the fray by the USA and most of Europe. Though Russia has in recent times retreated from most of the territories that were once so closely associated with it as the Soviet Union and on the other side ‘The British Empire’ is no more, still as a collective force, the nations of the West seek expansion. 

The expansion of the collective force of what during the second Iraq war was called, ‘The Coalition of the Willing’ can be identified across many diverse fronts of operation, though  NATO and the European Union are the two primary spearheads to effect this expansion. The goal of the expansion is to replace all forms of governance failing to conform to their standards. This goal guarantees permanent disruption to the geopolitical stability of the world until either they attain this goal or are conclusively and therefore permanently quarantined and therefore unable ever to achieve it.

Until the conclusion of the collective west’s goal the world will remain in a state of continual war by one means or another. In recent years we have seen the several means by which the western coalition of leaders have attempted to forward their goal. Outright military attack with an invasion force, draconian sanctions, propaganda wars, financial restraints, weaponized diplomacy, mass media conditioning among others. When problems arise and the type of war being fought is seen to be failing the response in the vast majority of cases is to double down, insisting that more of the same, whether force, pressure or demonization, will eventually turn the ride in their favour.

The tactics above have had mixed results for the western powers as can be seen by the events which have taken place in the nations targeted by the West for change in recent years. The hasty withdrawal from Afghanistan for instance, leaving it after twenty years to the Taliban, the intermittent (but now largely unreported chaos and instability) in both Iraq and Libya, the catastrophic proxy intervention in Syria and the abomination of  war torn Yemen, all signify that the western project is very far from going well.

However badly things go it appears that no Plan B exists for the western elites fuelling the vast majority of  this geopolitical instability, mass death, instability, chaos and perpetually destabilising upheaval. Is it possible there might come a time when they call a halt? It does not appear so, they appear always ready to continue their project no matter what, always doubling down, without any semblance of a reverse gear to their juggernaut. It only ever picks up speed. But what if it is headed directly toward a cliff face?

What circumstances might prevail if the juggernaut finally hits that cliff face and no more doubling down is possible without everything and everyone going up in flames? What will the western political elites do then? Will they at last throw up their hands and admit that their project was always an insane impossibility, that the world as it was and is has successfully resisted their attempt to transform it into what they assured themselves it should be? At that point a huge problem arises regarding this response.

The nub of this and so much else is that the western leaders in general have shown with monotonous regularity that they cannot be trusted. This goes for successive leaders of the USA in particular. Why? Because they deem themselves above all others and that they should be able to do what they wish at all times, irrespective of anything they have agreed in the past. This is all part of what they call their 'manifest destiny'. The latest manifestation of this is their cobbling together of a self-serving concept by the name of the 'International Rules Based Order', an order that they will always determine the outline of. 

The western political elites see themselves as the crown of creation. They conceive themselves to be doing their God's will. The Americans of course are the prime culprits of this kind of thinking, they being 'exceptional'. The British, they are quite clearly on board the same bus as 'superior' to all others. These two superiority complex challenged nations deem it their right to destroy whoever they like whenever they like in the furtherance of a world that suits them and their notions of grandeur where they remain top dogs in perpetuity. So it has been and continues to be in their latest project of destabilisation, insecurity, instability, death and destruction, Ukraine.

The time WILL come however when even the most rabid neoconservative will be forced to admit that the great project they have been dedicated to, have doubled down upon and forcefully promoted and sought to inveigle as official policy down successive administrations… has failed. Their mission, whether God-given or built upon purely human ambitions and desires, will no longer hold sway as all and sundry stand in the midst either of devastated rubble or a massive barrier erected by nations that have formed a powerful counter force to them. Will they plead for understanding and trust at that point? And what will be the response?

The Great Game, at the point being talked of, will have come to an end. The game will at that final blowing of the metaphorical whistle, have a winner and a loser. The loser, humbled, dazed and defeated will, in this case, retire from the fray. There will be no rematch. The end game having taken place all hopes of the West’s grand game plan being revived have dissolved. The successive political elites of the collective west have created the cage into which they will now be forever quarantined.

War is finally over.

THE WESTERN ELITE CREATION OF A DANGEROUSLY DIVIDED WORLD

In the days just before Joe Biden took office it was clear what mainstream news media was telling him to do.

Act to back NATO to the hilt and let us have no more of the Trump rhetoric that served only to weaken the resolve of the West to support it. Re-unite all America's allies in a close-knit group that Trump caused to question U.S. solidarity with them. With this re-united coalition of nations, which will once again be called 'The Free World', resolutely face all "enemies" unwilling to back a western world needing and deserving of the support of all after 9/11. 

It was clear in those pre-inauguration days that this would be the agenda for the upcoming Biden administration. Of course there would be the usual post-election soft-soap statements designed to give the impression of future unity within the USA itself, that this new administration would work in the interest of ALL Americans, not just those that had voted for Biden. This is invariably said immediately after such an election and invariably forgotten within days.

The foreign policy goal was clear. Unite the nations of the West under the supervision of the USA and its closest allies. The United Kingdom is of course the closest ally to the United States, followed some way behind by Germany and then, taking up the rear but generally extremely compliant are the other nations of the European Union. These would be the tight knit group (plus a few far allies such as Australia and New Zealand and, it was hoped, India, Turkey and Pakistan) who would present a united front against America's "enemies". It was clear then that the world was to be split again as it had been during the Cold War.

This new split however, would be seen to be without many of the checks and balances that characterised the cold War at its best. There would be extremely little diplomacy and where it appeared to be present it would in fact be little more than window dressing used as a tool to weaken, undermine and wrong-foot, the "enemy". Dialogue would be out of the question (though the Trump years appeared to provide some hope that it was indeed taking place. Though if you noticed at the time nothing very much came of it.) Detente? Completely out of the question. The war was to be permanent. Why so?

The reason why the war was to be permanent rests on the decisions made immediately after the events of nine eleven. A policy of no compromise was decided upon. Every last source of future danger was to be eliminated. Diplomacy would only lengthen the time before this could be effected so diplomacy was not to feature. The goal to eliminate and replace all potential sources of future danger was seen as absolutely urgent, there could be no delay. The USA would act with its allies to carry out the task using their overwhelming combined power and influence.

Thus we saw all the wars of choice that came after 9/11. Whether 9/11 was an inside job is irrelevant regarding the forces it unleashed. The attack upon and invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq came in quick succession. Then, seeing that full scale attacks and invasions had not produced perfect results, somewhat other means using proxy forces became the usual modus operandi. For Libya, NATO aerial attack was used. In Syria the use of proxy forces and convenient assistance from nearby interested parties were the tactics employed. Meanwhile every "enemy" was to be targeted by every means possible bar the military, primarily through demonization via already long-standing PsyOps (Psychological Operations) teams and those journalists and news organisations that were still accessible as in the previous CIA venture, 'Operation Mockingbird'. 

In the frenetic days after 9/11 it was seen as the patriotic duty of everyone across the western world to support the USA in its time of greatest tragedy and seen as extremely bad form to make ANY criticism of the U.S. or its authorities whatsoever. Therefore there was little need to persuade journalists across the West to write the necessary articles and produce the necessary TV news that fit this new time. America needed all the help it could get against a world that had shown itself to be disgracefully antagonistic toward it. Not that there was not plentiful cause for a great many nations not to see the USA as an innocent friend but more as a threatening and dangerous force that had to be propitiated to.

So it was that a consensus became quickly seen to exist around never saying a word of criticism about U.S. foreign policy or that of its allies. The 'Coalition of the Willing' were a supremely good and above suspicion, almost evangelical force that would slay all the fearsome dragons threatening their own citizens and, of course, presenting a threat to the USA (and through the USA to themselves). The USA and its allies were to get a blank check. Those it opposed and sought to eliminate and replace would get a big fat black cross next to their names. It was simplistic, black and white, good and evil... and so easy to "understand" and get behind. And so easy to communicate with the ideal form of simplistic power to convince. Think Adolf Hitler and the Nazis. Plain and simple. Just rinse and repeat. Over and over and over.

The regime change wars of choice however, began to hit problems. The simplistic notions of freedom and democracy and the building of "ideal" societies where they had never existed before began to palpably fail and be seen to fail. The 'Coalition of the Willing' began to refuse calls as the catastrophic failures of the project they had so willingly signed up to began to be excruciatingly obvious. One by one and then all in a rush they left Afghanistan. Iraq... after one chaotic situation after another with myriad forces jostling violently with one another, including ISIS, simply disappeared from the news. Much the same happened regarding Libya. In Syria, according to the simplistic views of the West the forces of darkness (Russia and the Syrian Arab Army) won out and it too largely disappeared from newsprint and screen.

Then came the next candidate before the ultimate and final project to bring down and replace the communist party of China. That candidate was of course Russia and the primary focus of the targeting Vladimir Putin. He had been a prime target since 2007 when he had stated unequivocally that Russia was not willing to be dominated by another nation or group of nations. This was purest anathema to those who insisted (at pain of elimination and replacement) that all nations must accept and fully comply with the now absolutely necessary post-9/11 domination of the western elites. Putin said no, sorry, we in Russia will NOT comply. We'll work with you on all the major international problems of the day, but Russia will not be ruled on major issues from outside her borders.

So it was that Russia came to be a problem to be "solved" and it was proceeded to be solved using the same techniques and tactics described above short of a military engagement; demonisation, diplomacy as a weapon, the media as a weapon, refusal of true dialogue... in short the weaponisation of all and everything that could assist in bringing the Russian leadership and the political structure (and if necessary) the financial and economic structure) of Russia to their knees. NATO, the EU and Ukraine would be the tools devised to effect this. No alleviation of the pressure on Russia would occur during this process. Trickery would take the place of diplomacy, the Minsk peace process would be a sham, no way out would be given Russia regarding the incremental loss of its security. The constant goal was to make it crack, fragment and disintegrate by all means possible.

This is where we are. The leaders of the west have no plan b. The doubling down must continue until the goal that cannot be questioned and has not been since 9/11 MUST be realised. Or the world destroyed in the process. It's all or nothing. No brakes exist or are desired. No diplomacy is advocated, no peace talks, nothing that might save lives and restore some balance and stability, only an ever-increasing beating of war drums and insertion of weaponry. The clock is ticking. The anxieties about China and the need to brings its leaders down before they become even more powerful and influential are growing. Russia must be "done" before that project gets into top gear. Russia however, due to its own needs of survival resists with all it's got. 

While we all stand watching, fear rising within us, each day understanding with ever greater clarity the danger we are all in, that this not going to have the same ending as the Cold War, that this is going all the way toward the worst possible climax imaginable and that we stand now on a completely divided world where everything we thought normal is under extreme threat of non-existence. And we feel helpless to do anything to slow the global schism and geopolitical juggernaut of western leadership destroying us all.

THE WESTERN WORLD OF WRAPAROUND LIES

What proportion of the populations in western nations still believe what their politicians, media news moderators and pundits say concerning what’s happening in Ukraine? How many have decided, instead of being a sponge in front of their televisions and an avid reader of their daily newspaper on this subject, that they will make an effort to look for alternate sources that offer a different (and more accurate) perspective?

The percentage is important, or at least it will be, when the next general or presidential election comes around. Those who have realised they have been subjected to what is called ‘The Mushroom Syndrome’, i.e. Kept in the dark and fed a load of shit, are likely to be extremely angry and dismayed at this point. Who could blame them for doing all in their power to turf those who have lied to them so consistently, out of office as soon as humanly possible.

Those lies have not been mere fibs, tiny white lies that come from those who mean well and wish to protect those who hear them from realities that could harm them. No, these are whoppers, and as black as black can be, deceptions worked out in offices in Whitehall, Fleet Street and their equivalents in the United States. Those that have not emerged from them come from locations such as Langley Virginia where psychological operations (PsyOps) manufacture “news articles” to be seeded on distant shores to come floating home with their source disguised or from think tanks where all the thinking going on is about how to deceive most effectively. 

The intelligence agencies in combination with lie factors have been slaving away night and day on the manufacturing of enough lies to gain the consent of western populations, to deluge them with these lies in a wall-to-wall, all-pervasive manner until they permeate every skull right down to the deepest subconscious. One of the main targets has been Vladimir Putin. Not since he was elected president in 2000 but only since 2007 when he gave an address (in Munich) where he disappointed all western elites by not agreeing to Russia being commanded by the USA and its allies. He stated that Russia would work closely with all parties to agree ways to stop nuclear proliferation, international terrorism and indeed all areas of mutual concern. However, none of his willingness to work with these elites was appreciated… only that he had said Russia would maintain its sovereignty and independence rather than be commanded from outside its borders. This was unacceptable by the western elites and had been since 9/11. Therefore Vladimir Putin required to be replaced.

The waterfall of attacks on Vladimir Putin began in the days, weeks, months and years only after his address to the ‘great and good’ elites of the western world on that cold February day in 2007. He would remain public enemy number one for them in perpetuity. He was to go and every attack dog across the political, media and intelligence elites was set to work on the task. Before his address Vladimir Putin was complimented, wined and dined, he and his wife were introduced to the royal family of the United kingdom, George W. Bush professed to looking in his eyes in 2001 and later said the following:

“I looked the man in the eye. I found him to be very straightforward and trustworthy.”

There would be no more such talk after February 2007. If there was it was said in private and very soon those with reputations and careers they wished to retain in the mainstream realised they had to ‘get with the program’ and shut up. Not only that, they had to spit some conjured up venom about the man to prove their credentials for being acceptable members of elite society.

Take a look for yourself. See if you can find any of the invective about Vladimir Putin prior to that day in 2007. You will seek in vain. The avalanches of fear, loathing, disgust and every possible accusation under the sun all came after his address to that group of security council attendees, none before. The reason is easy to ascertain. 9/11 had convinced those running the western world, most of them in the USA and UK, that no even partially uncontrolled entity, agency or government that was not willing to take orders from them had to go and they determined they would do EVERYTHING possible to bring their demise about.

The above is the primary reason why those in the West continue to be deluged with deceptions from every elite across the political and media fields. Post 9/11 the West was in ‘war mode’. This means that all those not completely aligned with your interests become your enemies and you can no longer say a single positive thing about them or about anything they have done or are doing. On the other hand, everything you say about them, what they say and what they do must be negative. The latter case is what we have seen since 2007 in regard to Vladimir Putin and is what we see now in regard to him and to everything to do with Ukraine.

Ukraine, recognised as having the most corrupt elites in Europe if not the entire world must be talked of as if they are virtual saints, completely pure, spotless and innocent. No mention must EVER be made regarding the many thousands of innocent civilians that their army killed in the east of the country over the years 2014 to the present day. You may have noticed how the fact that the Ukrainian military shelled apartment blocks, schools, kindergarten, polyclinics, orphanages, hospitals and town centres for all those years on a daily and nightly basis never reached your eyes or ears during those years. This was no accident. This was of course by design.

It didn’t fit the needs of the ‘war mode’ agenda that came into being after 9/11 to relate the full facts about the years above in Ukraine. To have told western audiences about these ongoing daily atrocities would have mitigated against the goal of ousting Vladimir Putin which required that Russia be subjected to unlimited pressure to foment his downfall by whatever means was at hand. Demonizing Russia was the goal. Demonizing Putin was the goal. To let the fact of Russia’s enemy, the western-controlled Ukrainian regime post 2014 be seen for the demons THEY were was simply not even considered. Despite their crimes against humanity they HAD TO BE portrayed as total innocents subjected to egregious attacks by the demonic Russians led by the chief demon himself, Vladimir Putin.

This is where we have been since 2007 and to even greater extent since 2014 and ramped up to its fullest extent from February 24th 2022, bathed 24/7 365 days per year across the entire western world… in lies. 

THE COLLECTIVE WEST IS IN A CYCLE THAT WILL NEUTER ITS AGGRESSIVE INSTINCTS

Each element involved in the neutering of the aggressive instincts of the collective west plays its part in the devastating effect we see occurring currently in regard to the long-held near absolute dominion the collective west has enjoyed for generations. 

Where the near dominion the collective west has held over the world looked at all shaky in the past it brought out its array of weapons from threats to bribes to blackmail to outright attacks using military might. Now the political elites of the U.S. have become weaker, partially due to massive overspending but also due to failed regime change operations, the overreach we have seen in regard to Ukraine including the stealing from Russians that has taken place. 

Along with the factors noted above there is also the rank idiocy of those who have held the levers of power in the USA since 9/11 and this especially has taken its toll. The unaligned nations and even those who appeared to be firmly aligned with the West have, since 9/11 have primarily taken note of three things:

1. The USA along with those aligned with it acted extremely recklessly in attacking numerous nations in the Middle East and the catastrophic results of those attacks are undeniable.

2. The nations in question can no longer trust that the USA will treat them well and never treat them as it does those others that cross it.

3. The nations in question now see an alternative source of great influence that can take the place of the USA being a far safer option that is unlikely to get turned against them as they now fear the USA may do.

The ‘safer option’ figures above all others, China. If China had not risen to where it is now it is impossible to see how the changes seen now could occur. Russia has a strong economy but it cannot compare to that of China. China provides the nations now migrating from being in league with the West to joining BRICS and beginning to drop the U.S. dollar as the world reserve currency, with an obvious healthy backbone that can be relied upon. 

China is crucial to all that is going on right now in regard to nations abandoning both long-held western hegemony and the U.S. dollar. In addition to being a safe haven from the overbearing and perpetually aggressive power of the West China is also playing a huge part in further diminishing the influence of the USA economically. 

China is not only facilitating the migration of nations from the US/U/EU orbit it is also serving to unify them under an economic umbrella. Those who can now safely emerge from under the American thumb due to the unstoppable rise of the economies of the global south and Eurasia will see the economies of the west decline as theirs rise. And this latter factor will diminish the ability of the U.S. warmongers to project power and this will serve to steadily quarantine them.

In outline only this is how things will go if present trends continue and it appears now that the process is unstoppable. Each factor comprises a virtual cycle toward a rebalancing both of economic power and power of influence. This cannot help but lead inevitably to a truly multipolar world where the western nations become simply one of many, neither exceptional nor superior and unable to have either the power or influence to bully, threaten or insist upon its will being done.

The era of western belligerence, of genocidal, racist, colonialist and imperialist modes of arrogant insistence of superiority will be over. The new powers now inexorably rising to take the place of  the US/UK/EU in terms of influence show no intent to duplicate the behaviour of their predecessors but instead display a desire to share power, to create agreement based on shared interests, to emphasise trade in a spirit of mutual tolerance. The nations of the collective west, predominantly the US/UK/EU, will of course be invited to relinquish its past and to embrace the spirit of mutually-beneficial tolerance that they had fought so foolishly. In time they will be seen to move from their neutered state to being at one in a global family of nations. A true world civilisation where agreement, not aggression is the prevailing rule then becomes a real possibility.

THE COLLECTIVE WEST IS FIGHTING A WAR AGAINST TIME

The world is steadily gravitating away from the nations of the collective west and those allied with them. The movement is toward the BRICS nations and also includes dropping the U.S. dollar as the world’s reserve currency. This is steadily diminishing the ability of the USA and its proxies to blackmail nations not conforming to their wishes by way of financial and economic sanctions. This process looks certain to increase as the western powers use this mechanism of dwindling power to twist arms due to the situation in Ukraine.

The nations of the collective west are caught in a Catch-22 situation whereby they need to exert maximum pressure on all nations to support them against Russia. Russia meanwhile has the better card to play, that of energy (oil and gas) when it comes to the nations the West wishes to blackmail into obedience. The greater the pressure the USA and those allied to it attempt to bring to bear the more they alienate the nations they target and the more certain they are to protect themselves by abandoning the U.S. dollar. (This by the way is why we are currently seeing a change in policy by the USA whereby an effort consisting of a softer approach composed of clearly insincere charm is being applied instead.)

The above love-bomb approach can only work to a limited extent however as the nations it is applied to can hardly mistake the wolf in sheep’s clothing or the dagger held behind the back while the other hand offers flowers. The USA has ruined its reputation regarding trust so many times over the years that what is likely to happen in response to its blandishments is an equally insincere welcoming thank you. The old saying by Theodore Roosevelt still fits in respect of the USA on the world stage still holds true and describes its foreign policy well currently: ‘Speak softly and carry a big stick’. 

How long will the USA be able to continue to threaten nations who don’t immediately obey its commands? Not for much longer if the clear intent to align with the BRICS nations is anything to go by or the signs that de-dollarization has become an unstoppable trend. Past times when the USA and its allies had only to snap their metaphorical fingers for the world to immediately stand to attention are fast ending. No longer will they be able to order other nations to jump, the only response from them being, “How high?” From the days of slavery through the colonial era the nations of the West have been abusing their positions of power to exploit the rest of the world. We are seeing the end of their ability to continue this abuse currently.

The nations of the west led by the USA and UK are suffering from the trends above just at the moment when ironically they are fighting for their top-dog position at the most crucial stage of all across their centuries-long period of global dictatorship. In Ukraine Russia finally broke free from the pressure-cooker policies the West had attempted to break her with. Subsequently the collective west attempted to crush Russia using all the power it thought it still had. This was a potentially fatal mistake. The nations it thought it could command no longer jump to attention as in the past. They saw where this would lead if they did so.

The world the USA, UK and their allies seek to create is one where they have even MORE power to dominate and control than before. Due to the events of 9/11 it was decided in Washington, then in London’s Whitehall and subsequently across all governmental elites within Europe that they could no longer tolerate the independence of states not willing to accept their dominance. So they set about destroying the foundations of all such incalcitrant nations.

Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and Syria were only some of the first tranche of nations to be undermined. All others until complete subservience was achieved were to follow. All the western collective powers were to work in unison, all speaking from the same geopolitical hymn sheet, all delivering the same narrative, working from the same agenda. And every last one of their mass media news outlets were to conform to all of the above also. The goal to undermine all nations not conforming to a future permanent western dictatorship was to be accepted without question or run the risk of being targeted yourself.

All may have gone well if Russia had not foreseen the above eventualities and planned for them and if China had not risen to a point where to assail it risked the destruction of at least half, if not the entire world. The western coalition was in a hurry due to the immensity of 9/11 for them. It had made them seem weak, vulnerable when they needed to project only strength. Therefore this had to be corrected in no time, an unconscionable event that had been considered a virtual impossibility had delivered an enormous blow to the facade of unassailable power that the West required to continue its dominance across the world. Now this had to be reinforced… and then some.

There were to be no half measures and no ethical or moral barriers to achieving the goal of supreme domination supported by total oversight using wall-to-wall 24/7 surveillance along with the undermining and replacement of all governmental systems that refused American/British/European command. 9/11 made this imperative. To not achieve this goal comprehensively and universally would leave them to that degree vulnerable at some undetermined future date. The danger could not be left to grow. It must be wiped out at its roots and never be allowed to grow ever again. This required a total restart for the world and the three allies (US/UK/EU) determined to achieve this. 

That determination is growing stronger just as it becomes clear that these three (US/UK/EU) are growing increasingly weaker and unable to achieve the ambition they have set themselves. Total Global Control. Full Spectrum Dominance. As time goes on and Russia becomes ever clearer to be the winner in Ukraine the dismay and determination of the western political elites grow stronger in tandem. Doubling down is seen to be the only solution, not backing down. There is no plan B, only the unquestioned forward movement to absolute control worldwide. To fail to achieve this is unacceptable. But… the West is running out of time. Things are not at all going their way, quite the geopolitical movement is in quite the opposite direction. 

What ultimate weapon might they bring to bear in their absolute desperation when no plan B can exist or even be contemplated? As the clock ticks down to no time left to achieve their goal what might these totally fixed-minded men and women dedicated to an impossible goal with no alternative contemplate? Would they even see NO world as being better than a world they are unable to completely control? These are the terrifying questions we are likely to ask ourselves as the collective west fights its war against the time that remains.

AT WHAT POINT DOES THE ZELENSKY WAR BECOME A SADISTIC EXERCISE?

The Ukrainian president and his regime in Kiev cannot possibly win out against Russia.

The Ukrainian offensive that is being waged currently is seeing massive numbers of Ukrainians die and the weaponry from.

With no direct military forces from the USA, UK, the EU or from NATO Zelensky’s cause is lost.

So why doesn’t he bow to the inevitable?

Each day people are dying on both sides. Ukrainian and Russian mothers, fathers, wives, brothers, sisters and children are losing their loved ones. So why does Zelensky keep the whole tragedy going?

The Russians told him before this action took place that if he responded to their demands there need be no loss of life. Zelensky ignored this offer and so the campaign began. At each stage Russia has repeated the same offer in various theatres of war, again with it being ignored. The most recent offer was made just recently in respect of Mariupol where the most virulent strain of Ukrainian Nazi-legacy hold-outs continue to resist.

Zelensky appears unmoved. Why? Could it be there is still some last hope that perhaps a chemical weapons attack set up by his people or more likely by the out of control extremist legions of neo-Nazis might trigger the response from the USA, UK, EU and NATO that he craves and save the day for the Euromaidan project that infamously began in 2014?

Is this the tenuous, prayed for, hope that keeps him holding on?

Is there any reason to believe that the now promised depleted uranium shells or F16 fighters or any other tactic, such as a chemical weapons false flag or a dirty bomb, even one made to look convincingly like the Russians perpetrated it, would bring NATO boots onto Ukrainian ground, or a rain of missiles bringing Russian planes down, enforcing a no-fly zone? The consensus of opinion across every analysis I have seen is that this would mean the beginning of an ever-widening war between Russia and the West, the EU and NATO which could easily escalate to the use of battleground nuclear weapons being used and then on to an intercontinental ballistic nuclear conflagration.

So, even creating a mass chemical weapon attack with multiple casualties, women, children dying, others crying out for help… scenes of misery seen in the Syrian false flag event just as the Syrian army was conclusively winning against the West’s proxies there.

There would be uproar, that is clear. And Russia WOULD immediately be given the blame, no question. Terrible scenes would be shown and endlessly repeated on TV screens worldwide. It would all add to the ostracise Russia campaign underway with potentially many nations now hesitant to take part then doing so. But would it draw the West into what could potentially become an all out world war where nuclear weapons wiped out a good proportion of humanity if not it all?

The chances are both the West and Russia would draw back from such a scenario.

This war will most likely grind on and on with upwards of 500 Ukrainian troops dying each and every day. The western powers are apparently insisting on this or all aid to Ukraine will end. It is the cruellest form of blackmail imaginable.

So why does Zelensky draw the pain, suffering and death out day after day rather than submit to the inevitable result which was inevitable since this all began on February 24th? There is no good reason and there NEVER WAS a good reason.

Putin waited seven long years hoping the regime in Kiev would be as good as its word. It failed to move one step toward peace, instead massively favouring war. Ultimately Putin made his decision on a number of additional reasons apart from the one above. But once that decision was made Russia was going to carry the operation begun on the 24th to its ultimate conclusion. Zelensky must surely have know that this was the case. He cannot NOT have known. He MUST have known this.

This is where the man they say is a hero is certainly anything but. In fact he is responsible every day that passes for refusing the Russian demands that WILL be met sooner or later and in so doing perpetuates what has become a senseless, callous, sadistic and suicidal exercise brought on his own people.